Belarus vs South-Eastern Asia and the Pacific: Lower-middle income: SDG indicator 5.5.2: Proportion of women in managerial positions
SDG indicator 5.5.2: Proportion of women in managerial positions over time
- Belarus
- South-Eastern Asia and the Pacific: Lower-middle income
How they compare
Belarus currently reports 45.19 against 40.22 in South-Eastern Asia and the Pacific: Lower-middle income, a difference of 4.97.
That makes Belarus's figure about 1.1 times South-Eastern Asia and the Pacific: Lower-middle income's.
Across all 10 years both countries report, Belarus has been ahead every year.
Belarus ranks 17th and South-Eastern Asia and the Pacific: Lower-middle income ranks 19th of 137 countries.
Belarus has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | South-Eastern Asia and the Pacific: Lower-middle income | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 46.29 | 43.04 | 3.24 | Belarus |
| 2010s | 47.5 | 39.55 | 7.95 | Belarus |
| 2020s | 46.89 | 40.86 | 6.02 | Belarus |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher sdg indicator 5.5.2: proportion of women in managerial positions, Belarus or South-Eastern Asia and the Pacific: Lower-middle income?
- Belarus, at 45.19 against 40.22 in South-Eastern Asia and the Pacific: Lower-middle income as of 2024.
- What is the difference in sdg indicator 5.5.2: proportion of women in managerial positions between Belarus and South-Eastern Asia and the Pacific: Lower-middle income?
- 4.97, with Belarus ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and South-Eastern Asia and the Pacific: Lower-middle income?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2024.
- How do Belarus and South-Eastern Asia and the Pacific: Lower-middle income rank globally for sdg indicator 5.5.2: proportion of women in managerial positions?
- Belarus ranks 17th and South-Eastern Asia and the Pacific: Lower-middle income ranks 19th of 137 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Labour Organization, published as SDG indicator 5.5.2: Proportion of women in managerial positions (previous ILO definition - ICLS13). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Data may differ from nationally reported figures and the Global SDG Indicators Database due to differences in sources and/or reference years. The female share of employment in managerial positions conveys the number of women in management as a percentage of employment in management. Employment in management is defined based on the International Standard Classification of Occupations. This series refers to total management (category 1 of ISCO-08 or ISCO-88). There is another series referring to senior and middle management only, thus excluding junior management (category 1 in both ISCO-08 and ISCO-88 minus category 14 in ISCO-08 and minus category 13 in ISCO-88). This indicator is calculated based on data on employment by sex and occupation. For more information, refer to the Labour Market-related SDG Indicators (ILOSDG) database description.