Macau, China vs United States of America: Time-related underemployment, male
Macau, China
0.9%
in 2016
United States of America
0.9%
in 2025
Macau, China rank
83rd
United States of America rank
81st
Time-related underemployment, male over time
- Macau, China
- United States of America
How they compare
United States of America currently reports 0.9% against 0.9% in Macau, China, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 8 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Macau, China ahead.
Macau, China ranks 83rd and United States of America ranks 81st of 103 countries.
Macau, China has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Macau, China | United States of America | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3.0% | 2.4% | 0.6% | Macau, China |
| 2010s | 1.3% | 1.3% | 0.0% | Macau, China |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher time-related underemployment, male, Macau, China or United States of America?
- United States of America, at 0.9% against 0.9% in Macau, China as of 2025.
- What is the difference in time-related underemployment, male between Macau, China and United States of America?
- 0.0%, with United States of America ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Macau, China and United States of America?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2016.
- How do Macau, China and United States of America rank globally for time-related underemployment, male?
- Macau, China ranks 83rd and United States of America ranks 81st of 103 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Labour Organization. “Labour Force Statistics database (LFS)” ILOSTAT. Accessed January 07, 2025. https://ilostat.ilo.org/data/, published as Time-related underemployment, male (% of employment). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Time-related underemployment refers to all persons in employment who (i) wanted to work additional hours, (ii) had worked less than a specified hours threshold (working time in all jobs), and (iii) were available to work additional hours given an opportunity for more work.