Lithuania vs Palestine, State of: Time-related underemployment, male
Lithuania
1.4%
in 2024
Palestine, State of
1.7%
in 2025
Lithuania rank
74th
Palestine, State of rank
71st
Time-related underemployment, male over time
- Lithuania
- Palestine, State of
How they compare
Palestine, State of currently reports 1.7% against 1.4% in Lithuania, a difference of 0.3%.
That makes Palestine, State of's figure about 1.2 times Lithuania's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 9 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Palestine, State of ahead.
Lithuania ranks 74th and Palestine, State of ranks 71st of 103 countries.
Palestine, State of has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lithuania | Palestine, State of | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 1.1% | 2.8% | 1.7% | Palestine, State of |
| 2020s | 1.4% | 1.9% | 0.5% | Palestine, State of |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher time-related underemployment, male, Lithuania or Palestine, State of?
- Palestine, State of, at 1.7% against 1.4% in Lithuania as of 2025.
- What is the difference in time-related underemployment, male between Lithuania and Palestine, State of?
- 0.3%, with Palestine, State of ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lithuania and Palestine, State of?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2024.
- How do Lithuania and Palestine, State of rank globally for time-related underemployment, male?
- Lithuania ranks 74th and Palestine, State of ranks 71st of 103 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Labour Organization. “Labour Force Statistics database (LFS)” ILOSTAT. Accessed January 07, 2025. https://ilostat.ilo.org/data/, published as Time-related underemployment, male (% of employment). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Time-related underemployment refers to all persons in employment who (i) wanted to work additional hours, (ii) had worked less than a specified hours threshold (working time in all jobs), and (iii) were available to work additional hours given an opportunity for more work.