Hong Kong vs Lithuania: Time-related underemployment, male (% of employment)
Hong Kong
1.6%
in 2024
Lithuania
1.4%
in 2024
Hong Kong rank
72nd
Lithuania rank
74th
Time-related underemployment, male (% of employment) over time
- Hong Kong
- Lithuania
How they compare
Hong Kong currently reports 1.6% against 1.4% in Lithuania, a difference of 0.2%.
That makes Hong Kong's figure about 1.1 times Lithuania's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 16 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Hong Kong ahead.
Hong Kong ranks 72nd and Lithuania ranks 74th of 103 countries.
Hong Kong has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Hong Kong | Lithuania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3.3% | 3.0% | 0.3% | Hong Kong |
| 2010s | 2.1% | 1.9% | 0.2% | Hong Kong |
| 2020s | 2.7% | 1.4% | 1.3% | Hong Kong |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher time-related underemployment, male, Hong Kong or Lithuania?
- Hong Kong, at 1.6% against 1.4% in Lithuania as of 2024.
- What is the difference in time-related underemployment, male between Hong Kong and Lithuania?
- 0.2%, with Hong Kong ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong and Lithuania?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2024.
- How do Hong Kong and Lithuania rank globally for time-related underemployment, male?
- Hong Kong ranks 72nd and Lithuania ranks 74th of 103 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Labour Organization. “Labour Force Statistics database (LFS)” ILOSTAT. Accessed January 07, 2025. https://ilostat.ilo.org/data/, published as Time-related underemployment, male (% of employment). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Time-related underemployment refers to all persons in employment who (i) wanted to work additional hours, (ii) had worked less than a specified hours threshold (working time in all jobs), and (iii) were available to work additional hours given an opportunity for more work.