Americas: Lower-middle income vs Latvia: SDG indicator 5.5.2: Proportion of women in managerial positions

Americas: Lower-middle income
38
in 2025
Latvia
43.72
in 2025
Americas: Lower-middle income rank
28th
Latvia rank
28th

SDG indicator 5.5.2: Proportion of women in managerial positions over time

  • Americas: Lower-middle income
  • Latvia
0204060200020122025

How they compare

Latvia currently reports 43.72 against 38 in Americas: Lower-middle income, a difference of 5.72.

That makes Latvia's figure about 1.2 times Americas: Lower-middle income's.

Across all 26 years both countries report, Latvia has been ahead every year.

Americas: Lower-middle income ranks 28th and Latvia ranks 28th of 87 groups.

Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Americas: Lower-middle income Latvia Difference Ahead
2000s 25.57 41.15 15.59 Latvia
2010s 31.51 44.69 13.17 Latvia
2020s 36.37 45.58 9.21 Latvia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher sdg indicator 5.5.2: proportion of women in managerial positions, Americas: Lower-middle income or Latvia?
Latvia, at 43.72 against 38 in Americas: Lower-middle income as of 2025.
What is the difference in sdg indicator 5.5.2: proportion of women in managerial positions between Americas: Lower-middle income and Latvia?
5.72, with Latvia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Americas: Lower-middle income and Latvia?
26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
How do Americas: Lower-middle income and Latvia rank globally for sdg indicator 5.5.2: proportion of women in managerial positions?
Americas: Lower-middle income ranks 28th and Latvia ranks 28th of 87 groups.
Where does this data come from?
International Labour Organization, published as SDG indicator 5.5.2: Proportion of women in managerial positions (previous ILO definition - ICLS13). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Americas: Lower-middle income vs Latvia: SDG indicator 5.5.2: Proportion of women in managerial positions. Statizoid, drawing on International Labour Organization. Retrieved 15 September 2026, from https://gender.statizoid.com/compare/sdg-indicator-5-5-2-proportion-of-women-in-managerial-positions-previous-ilo-definition/americas-lower-middle-income/latvia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under ILO Terms of Use (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://gender.statizoid.com/compare/sdg-indicator-5-5-2-proportion-of-women-in-managerial-positions-previous-ilo-definition/americas-lower-middle-income/latvia/">Americas: Lower-middle income vs Latvia: SDG indicator 5.5.2: Proportion of women in managerial positions</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
SDG indicator 5.5.2: Proportion of women in managerial positions (previous ILO definition - ICLS13)
Source
International Labour Organization
Licence
ILO Terms of Use (attribution required)
Coverage
224 places, 4,694 data points, 2000–2025
Last refreshed

Data may differ from nationally reported figures and the Global SDG Indicators Database due to differences in sources and/or reference years. The female share of employment in managerial positions conveys the number of women in management as a percentage of employment in management. Employment in management is defined based on the International Standard Classification of Occupations. This series refers to total management (category 1 of ISCO-08 or ISCO-88). There is another series referring to senior and middle management only, thus excluding junior management (category 1 in both ISCO-08 and ISCO-88 minus category 14 in ISCO-08 and minus category 13 in ISCO-88). This indicator is calculated based on data on employment by sex and occupation. For more information, refer to the Labour Market-related SDG Indicators (ILOSDG) database description.