Statizoid

Equal access to financial services for women and men in Bosnia and Herzegovina

Bosnia and Herzegovina: Equal access to financial services for women and men was 1 (1=yes; 0=no) in 2023. ◆ Volatile

Latest (2023)
1 (1=yes; 0=no)
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
1st
of 188 countries
All-time high
1 (1=yes; 0=no)
in 2010
All-time low
0 (1=yes; 0=no)
in 1970
Years of data
54
1970–2023

Equal access to financial services for women and men in Bosnia and Herzegovina, 1970–2023

00.20.40.60.81197019962023

Source: Women, Business and the Law; World Bank – processed by Our World in Data. Measured in (1=yes; 0=no).

Analysis

The most recent figure for equal access to financial services for women and men in Bosnia and Herzegovina is 1 (1=yes; 0=no), measured in 2023. That is the highest value across all 54 years on record.

The figure is unchanged over ten years.

Over the whole period, equal access to financial services for women and men in Bosnia and Herzegovina peaked at 1 (1=yes; 0=no) in 2010 and was at its lowest, 0 (1=yes; 0=no), in 1970.

Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 1st of 188 countries on this measure, in the top 10%.

The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.

Equal access to financial services for women and men in Bosnia and Herzegovina, year by year

Year (1=yes; 0=no) Change
1970 0 (1=yes; 0=no) —
1971 0 (1=yes; 0=no) —
1972 0 (1=yes; 0=no) —
1973 0 (1=yes; 0=no) —
1974 0 (1=yes; 0=no) —
1975 0 (1=yes; 0=no) —
1976 0 (1=yes; 0=no) —
1977 0 (1=yes; 0=no) —
1978 0 (1=yes; 0=no) —
1979 0 (1=yes; 0=no) —
1980 0 (1=yes; 0=no) —
1981 0 (1=yes; 0=no) —
1982 0 (1=yes; 0=no) —
1983 0 (1=yes; 0=no) —
1984 0 (1=yes; 0=no) —
1985 0 (1=yes; 0=no) —
1986 0 (1=yes; 0=no) —
1987 0 (1=yes; 0=no) —
1988 0 (1=yes; 0=no) —
1989 0 (1=yes; 0=no) —
1990 0 (1=yes; 0=no) —
1991 0 (1=yes; 0=no) —
1992 0 (1=yes; 0=no) —
1993 0 (1=yes; 0=no) —
1994 0 (1=yes; 0=no) —
1995 0 (1=yes; 0=no) —
1996 0 (1=yes; 0=no) —
1997 0 (1=yes; 0=no) —
1998 0 (1=yes; 0=no) —
1999 0 (1=yes; 0=no) —
2000 0 (1=yes; 0=no) —
2001 0 (1=yes; 0=no) —
2002 0 (1=yes; 0=no) —
2003 0 (1=yes; 0=no) —
2004 0 (1=yes; 0=no) —
2005 0 (1=yes; 0=no) —
2006 0 (1=yes; 0=no) —
2007 0 (1=yes; 0=no) —
2008 0 (1=yes; 0=no) —
2009 0 (1=yes; 0=no) —
2010 1 (1=yes; 0=no) —
2011 1 (1=yes; 0=no) +0.0%
2012 1 (1=yes; 0=no) +0.0%
2013 1 (1=yes; 0=no) +0.0%
2014 1 (1=yes; 0=no) +0.0%
2015 1 (1=yes; 0=no) +0.0%
2016 1 (1=yes; 0=no) +0.0%
2017 1 (1=yes; 0=no) +0.0%
2018 1 (1=yes; 0=no) +0.0%
2019 1 (1=yes; 0=no) +0.0%
2020 1 (1=yes; 0=no) +0.0%
2021 1 (1=yes; 0=no) +0.0%
2022 1 (1=yes; 0=no) +0.0%
2023 1 (1=yes; 0=no) +0.0%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
1970s 0 (1=yes; 0=no) 0 (1=yes; 0=no) 0 (1=yes; 0=no) 10
1980s 0 (1=yes; 0=no) 0 (1=yes; 0=no) 0 (1=yes; 0=no) 10
1990s 0 (1=yes; 0=no) 0 (1=yes; 0=no) 0 (1=yes; 0=no) 10
2000s 0 (1=yes; 0=no) 0 (1=yes; 0=no) 0 (1=yes; 0=no) 10
2010s 1 (1=yes; 0=no) 1 (1=yes; 0=no) 1 (1=yes; 0=no) 10
2020s 1 (1=yes; 0=no) 1 (1=yes; 0=no) 1 (1=yes; 0=no) 4

Countries ranked near Bosnia and Herzegovina

  1. 1 Albania 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  2. 1 Angola 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  3. 1 Australia 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  4. 1 Austria 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  5. 1 Azerbaijan 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  6. 1 Bahrain 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  7. 1 Belgium 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  8. 1 Benin 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  9. 1 Bolivia, Plurinational State of 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  10. 1 Bulgaria 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  11. 1 Burkina Faso 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  12. 1 Cambodia 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  13. 1 Canada 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  14. 1 Cape Verde 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  15. 1 Côte d'Ivoire 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  16. 1 Croatia 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  17. 1 Cyprus 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  18. 1 Czechia 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  19. 1 Congo, Democratic Republic of the 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  20. 1 Denmark 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  21. 1 Djibouti 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  22. 1 Dominican Republic 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  23. 1 Egypt 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  24. 1 El Salvador 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  25. 1 Estonia 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  26. 1 Ethiopia 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  27. 1 Finland 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  28. 1 France 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  29. 1 Gabon 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  30. 1 Georgia 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  31. 1 Germany 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  32. 1 Greece 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  33. 1 Guinea 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  34. 1 Guyana 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  35. 1 Honduras 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  36. 1 Hong Kong, China 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  37. 1 Hungary 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  38. 1 Iceland 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  39. 1 Iraq 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  40. 1 Ireland 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  41. 1 Israel 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  42. 1 Italy 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  43. 1 Jordan 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  44. 1 Kenya 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  45. 1 Kyrgyzstan 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  46. 1 Lao People's Democratic Republic 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  47. 1 Latvia 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  48. 1 Lithuania 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  49. 1 Luxembourg 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  50. 1 Maldives 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  51. 1 Malta 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  52. 1 Marshall Islands 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  53. 1 Mauritius 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  54. 1 Mexico 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  55. 1 Republic of Moldova 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  56. 1 Mongolia 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  57. 1 Montenegro 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  58. 1 Morocco 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  59. 1 Mozambique 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  60. 1 Netherlands 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  61. 1 New Zealand 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  62. 1 Nicaragua 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  63. 1 North Macedonia 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  64. 1 Paraguay 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  65. 1 Peru 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  66. 1 Philippines 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  67. 1 Poland 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  68. 1 Portugal 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  69. 1 Puerto Rico 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  70. 1 Romania 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  71. 1 Rwanda 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  72. 1 Saudi Arabia 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  73. 1 Serbia 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  74. 1 Sierra Leone 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  75. 1 Slovakia 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  76. 1 Slovenia 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  77. 1 South Africa 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  78. 1 Republic of Korea 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  79. 1 Spain 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  80. 1 Sweden 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  81. 1 Tajikistan 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  82. 1 Togo 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  83. 1 Trinidad and Tobago 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  84. 1 Ukraine 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  85. 1 United Arab Emirates 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  86. 1 United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  87. 1 United States of America 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  88. 1 Uzbekistan 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  89. 1 Vanuatu 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  90. 1 Viet Nam 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  91. 1 Zambia 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  92. 1 Zimbabwe 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare

See the full ranking of 188 places →

More gender data for Bosnia and Herzegovina

All data for Bosnia and Herzegovina →

Frequently asked questions

What is equal access to financial services for women and men in Bosnia and Herzegovina?
Equal access to financial services for women and men in Bosnia and Herzegovina was 1 (1=yes; 0=no) in 2023, according to Women, Business and the Law; World Bank – processed by Our World in Data.
What is the highest equal access to financial services for women and men recorded in Bosnia and Herzegovina?
The highest recorded value was 1 (1=yes; 0=no) in 2010.
What is the lowest equal access to financial services for women and men recorded in Bosnia and Herzegovina?
The lowest recorded value was 0 (1=yes; 0=no) in 1970.
How does Bosnia and Herzegovina rank for equal access to financial services for women and men?
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 1st out of 188 countries with data for 2023.
Is equal access to financial services for women and men rising or falling in Bosnia and Herzegovina?
Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
Where does this Bosnia and Herzegovina data come from?
The figures come from Women, Business and the Law; World Bank – processed by Our World in Data, published as part of Equal access to financial services for women and men. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 54 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Equal access to financial services for women and men in Bosnia and Herzegovina. Statizoid, drawing on Women, Business and the Law; World Bank – processed by Our World in Data. Retrieved 06 September 2026, from https://gender.statizoid.com/stat/discrimination-access-to-credit-gender/bosnia-and-herzegovina/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://gender.statizoid.com/stat/discrimination-access-to-credit-gender/bosnia-and-herzegovina/">Equal access to financial services for women and men in Bosnia and Herzegovina</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Equal access to financial services for women and men
Unit
(1=yes; 0=no)
Source
Women, Business and the Law; World Bank – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
188 places, 10,152 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

The law prohibits gender discrimination by banks or other financial institutions, and requires equal treatment of women and men in financial transactions, business activities, financial assistance, and access to goods and services.