Philippines vs South-Eastern Asia and the Pacific: High income: SDG indicator 5.5.2: Proportion of women in managerial positions

Philippines
45.7
in 2023
South-Eastern Asia and the Pacific: High income
40.79
in 2025
Philippines rank
15th
South-Eastern Asia and the Pacific: High income rank
16th

SDG indicator 5.5.2: Proportion of women in managerial positions over time

  • Philippines
  • South-Eastern Asia and the Pacific: High income
0204060200020122025

How they compare

Philippines currently reports 45.7 against 40.79 in South-Eastern Asia and the Pacific: High income, a difference of 4.91.

That makes Philippines's figure about 1.1 times South-Eastern Asia and the Pacific: High income's.

Across all 18 years both countries report, Philippines has been ahead every year.

Philippines ranks 15th and South-Eastern Asia and the Pacific: High income ranks 16th of 137 countries.

Philippines has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Philippines South-Eastern Asia and the Pacific: High income Difference Ahead
2000s 56.92 33.22 23.7 Philippines
2010s 50.06 35.66 14.4 Philippines
2020s 50.16 39.39 10.78 Philippines

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher sdg indicator 5.5.2: proportion of women in managerial positions, Philippines or South-Eastern Asia and the Pacific: High income?
Philippines, at 45.7 against 40.79 in South-Eastern Asia and the Pacific: High income as of 2023.
What is the difference in sdg indicator 5.5.2: proportion of women in managerial positions between Philippines and South-Eastern Asia and the Pacific: High income?
4.91, with Philippines ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Philippines and South-Eastern Asia and the Pacific: High income?
18 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2023.
How do Philippines and South-Eastern Asia and the Pacific: High income rank globally for sdg indicator 5.5.2: proportion of women in managerial positions?
Philippines ranks 15th and South-Eastern Asia and the Pacific: High income ranks 16th of 137 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Labour Organization, published as SDG indicator 5.5.2: Proportion of women in managerial positions (previous ILO definition - ICLS13). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Philippines vs South-Eastern Asia and the Pacific: High income: SDG indicator 5.5.2: Proportion of women in managerial positions. Statizoid, drawing on International Labour Organization. Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://gender.statizoid.com/compare/sdg-indicator-5-5-2-proportion-of-women-in-managerial-positions-previous-ilo-definition/philippines/south-eastern-asia-and-the-pacific-high-income/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under ILO Terms of Use (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://gender.statizoid.com/compare/sdg-indicator-5-5-2-proportion-of-women-in-managerial-positions-previous-ilo-definition/philippines/south-eastern-asia-and-the-pacific-high-income/">Philippines vs South-Eastern Asia and the Pacific: High income: SDG indicator 5.5.2: Proportion of women in managerial positions</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
SDG indicator 5.5.2: Proportion of women in managerial positions (previous ILO definition - ICLS13)
Source
International Labour Organization
Licence
ILO Terms of Use (attribution required)
Coverage
224 places, 4,694 data points, 2000–2025
Last refreshed

Data may differ from nationally reported figures and the Global SDG Indicators Database due to differences in sources and/or reference years. The female share of employment in managerial positions conveys the number of women in management as a percentage of employment in management. Employment in management is defined based on the International Standard Classification of Occupations. This series refers to total management (category 1 of ISCO-08 or ISCO-88). There is another series referring to senior and middle management only, thus excluding junior management (category 1 in both ISCO-08 and ISCO-88 minus category 14 in ISCO-08 and minus category 13 in ISCO-88). This indicator is calculated based on data on employment by sex and occupation. For more information, refer to the Labour Market-related SDG Indicators (ILOSDG) database description.