Hong Kong, China vs Zimbabwe: SDG indicator 5.5.2: Proportion of women in managerial positions

Hong Kong, China
38.49
in 2025
Zimbabwe
38.26
in 2024
Hong Kong, China rank
58th
Zimbabwe rank
60th

SDG indicator 5.5.2: Proportion of women in managerial positions over time

  • Hong Kong, China
  • Zimbabwe
010203040200020122025

How they compare

Hong Kong, China currently reports 38.49 against 38.26 in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0.23.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 7 shared years of data; in 2011 it was Hong Kong, China ahead.

Hong Kong, China ranks 58th and Zimbabwe ranks 60th of 137 countries.

Hong Kong, China has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Hong Kong, China Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
2010s 33.73 27.28 6.45 Hong Kong, China
2020s 38.11 36.98 1.12 Hong Kong, China

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher sdg indicator 5.5.2: proportion of women in managerial positions, Hong Kong, China or Zimbabwe?
Hong Kong, China, at 38.49 against 38.26 in Zimbabwe as of 2025.
What is the difference in sdg indicator 5.5.2: proportion of women in managerial positions between Hong Kong, China and Zimbabwe?
0.23, with Hong Kong, China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong, China and Zimbabwe?
7 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2024.
How do Hong Kong, China and Zimbabwe rank globally for sdg indicator 5.5.2: proportion of women in managerial positions?
Hong Kong, China ranks 58th and Zimbabwe ranks 60th of 137 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Labour Organization, published as SDG indicator 5.5.2: Proportion of women in managerial positions (previous ILO definition - ICLS13). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Hong Kong, China vs Zimbabwe: SDG indicator 5.5.2: Proportion of women in managerial positions. Statizoid, drawing on International Labour Organization. Retrieved 15 September 2026, from https://gender.statizoid.com/compare/sdg-indicator-5-5-2-proportion-of-women-in-managerial-positions-previous-ilo-definition/hong-kong-sar-china/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under ILO Terms of Use (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://gender.statizoid.com/compare/sdg-indicator-5-5-2-proportion-of-women-in-managerial-positions-previous-ilo-definition/hong-kong-sar-china/zimbabwe/">Hong Kong, China vs Zimbabwe: SDG indicator 5.5.2: Proportion of women in managerial positions</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
SDG indicator 5.5.2: Proportion of women in managerial positions (previous ILO definition - ICLS13)
Source
International Labour Organization
Licence
ILO Terms of Use (attribution required)
Coverage
224 places, 4,694 data points, 2000–2025
Last refreshed

Data may differ from nationally reported figures and the Global SDG Indicators Database due to differences in sources and/or reference years. The female share of employment in managerial positions conveys the number of women in management as a percentage of employment in management. Employment in management is defined based on the International Standard Classification of Occupations. This series refers to total management (category 1 of ISCO-08 or ISCO-88). There is another series referring to senior and middle management only, thus excluding junior management (category 1 in both ISCO-08 and ISCO-88 minus category 14 in ISCO-08 and minus category 13 in ISCO-88). This indicator is calculated based on data on employment by sex and occupation. For more information, refer to the Labour Market-related SDG Indicators (ILOSDG) database description.