Austria vs Central and Western Asia: Upper-middle income: SDG indicator 5.5.2: Proportion of women in managerial positions

Austria
37.2
in 2025
Central and Western Asia: Upper-middle income
26.11
in 2025
Austria rank
65th
Central and Western Asia: Upper-middle income rank
65th

SDG indicator 5.5.2: Proportion of women in managerial positions over time

  • Austria
  • Central and Western Asia: Upper-middle income
101520253035200020122025

How they compare

Austria currently reports 37.2 against 26.11 in Central and Western Asia: Upper-middle income, a difference of 11.09.

That makes Austria's figure about 1.4 times Central and Western Asia: Upper-middle income's.

Across all 26 years both countries report, Austria has been ahead every year.

Austria ranks 65th and Central and Western Asia: Upper-middle income ranks 65th of 137 countries.

Austria has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Austria Central and Western Asia: Upper-middle income Difference Ahead
2000s 27.98 14.63 13.35 Austria
2010s 30.42 21.13 9.29 Austria
2020s 35.06 25.63 9.43 Austria

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher sdg indicator 5.5.2: proportion of women in managerial positions, Austria or Central and Western Asia: Upper-middle income?
Austria, at 37.2 against 26.11 in Central and Western Asia: Upper-middle income as of 2025.
What is the difference in sdg indicator 5.5.2: proportion of women in managerial positions between Austria and Central and Western Asia: Upper-middle income?
11.09, with Austria ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Austria and Central and Western Asia: Upper-middle income?
26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
How do Austria and Central and Western Asia: Upper-middle income rank globally for sdg indicator 5.5.2: proportion of women in managerial positions?
Austria ranks 65th and Central and Western Asia: Upper-middle income ranks 65th of 137 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Labour Organization, published as SDG indicator 5.5.2: Proportion of women in managerial positions (previous ILO definition - ICLS13). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Austria vs Central and Western Asia: Upper-middle income: SDG indicator 5.5.2: Proportion of women in managerial positions. Statizoid, drawing on International Labour Organization. Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://gender.statizoid.com/compare/sdg-indicator-5-5-2-proportion-of-women-in-managerial-positions-previous-ilo-definition/austria/central-and-western-asia-upper-middle-income/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under ILO Terms of Use (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://gender.statizoid.com/compare/sdg-indicator-5-5-2-proportion-of-women-in-managerial-positions-previous-ilo-definition/austria/central-and-western-asia-upper-middle-income/">Austria vs Central and Western Asia: Upper-middle income: SDG indicator 5.5.2: Proportion of women in managerial positions</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
SDG indicator 5.5.2: Proportion of women in managerial positions (previous ILO definition - ICLS13)
Source
International Labour Organization
Licence
ILO Terms of Use (attribution required)
Coverage
224 places, 4,694 data points, 2000–2025
Last refreshed

Data may differ from nationally reported figures and the Global SDG Indicators Database due to differences in sources and/or reference years. The female share of employment in managerial positions conveys the number of women in management as a percentage of employment in management. Employment in management is defined based on the International Standard Classification of Occupations. This series refers to total management (category 1 of ISCO-08 or ISCO-88). There is another series referring to senior and middle management only, thus excluding junior management (category 1 in both ISCO-08 and ISCO-88 minus category 14 in ISCO-08 and minus category 13 in ISCO-88). This indicator is calculated based on data on employment by sex and occupation. For more information, refer to the Labour Market-related SDG Indicators (ILOSDG) database description.