Asia and the Pacific vs South Africa: SDG indicator 5.5.2: Proportion of women in managerial positions

Asia and the Pacific
20.02
in 2025
South Africa
35.53
in 2024
Asia and the Pacific rank
72nd
South Africa rank
75th

SDG indicator 5.5.2: Proportion of women in managerial positions over time

  • Asia and the Pacific
  • South Africa
010203040200020122025

How they compare

South Africa currently reports 35.53 against 20.02 in Asia and the Pacific, a difference of 15.51.

That makes South Africa's figure about 1.8 times Asia and the Pacific's.

Across all 25 years both countries report, South Africa has been ahead every year.

Asia and the Pacific ranks 72nd and South Africa ranks 75th of 87 groups.

South Africa has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Asia and the Pacific South Africa Difference Ahead
2000s 16.7 27.34 10.64 South Africa
2010s 18.61 30.78 12.17 South Africa
2020s 20.11 32.97 12.86 South Africa

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher sdg indicator 5.5.2: proportion of women in managerial positions, Asia and the Pacific or South Africa?
South Africa, at 35.53 against 20.02 in Asia and the Pacific as of 2024.
What is the difference in sdg indicator 5.5.2: proportion of women in managerial positions between Asia and the Pacific and South Africa?
15.51, with South Africa ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Asia and the Pacific and South Africa?
25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
How do Asia and the Pacific and South Africa rank globally for sdg indicator 5.5.2: proportion of women in managerial positions?
Asia and the Pacific ranks 72nd and South Africa ranks 75th of 87 groups.
Where does this data come from?
International Labour Organization, published as SDG indicator 5.5.2: Proportion of women in managerial positions (previous ILO definition - ICLS13). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Asia and the Pacific vs South Africa: SDG indicator 5.5.2: Proportion of women in managerial positions. Statizoid, drawing on International Labour Organization. Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://gender.statizoid.com/compare/sdg-indicator-5-5-2-proportion-of-women-in-managerial-positions-previous-ilo-definition/asia-and-the-pacific/south-africa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under ILO Terms of Use (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://gender.statizoid.com/compare/sdg-indicator-5-5-2-proportion-of-women-in-managerial-positions-previous-ilo-definition/asia-and-the-pacific/south-africa/">Asia and the Pacific vs South Africa: SDG indicator 5.5.2: Proportion of women in managerial positions</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
SDG indicator 5.5.2: Proportion of women in managerial positions (previous ILO definition - ICLS13)
Source
International Labour Organization
Licence
ILO Terms of Use (attribution required)
Coverage
224 places, 4,694 data points, 2000–2025
Last refreshed

Data may differ from nationally reported figures and the Global SDG Indicators Database due to differences in sources and/or reference years. The female share of employment in managerial positions conveys the number of women in management as a percentage of employment in management. Employment in management is defined based on the International Standard Classification of Occupations. This series refers to total management (category 1 of ISCO-08 or ISCO-88). There is another series referring to senior and middle management only, thus excluding junior management (category 1 in both ISCO-08 and ISCO-88 minus category 14 in ISCO-08 and minus category 13 in ISCO-88). This indicator is calculated based on data on employment by sex and occupation. For more information, refer to the Labour Market-related SDG Indicators (ILOSDG) database description.