Peru vs South Africa: Prevalence of anaemia in pregnant women (aged 15-49)
Peru
17.6%
in 2019
South Africa
17.8%
in 2019
Peru rank
93rd
South Africa rank
91st
Prevalence of anaemia in pregnant women (aged 15-49) over time
- Peru
- South Africa
How they compare
South Africa currently reports 17.8% against 17.6% in Peru, a difference of 0.2%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 20 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Peru ahead.
Peru ranks 93rd and South Africa ranks 91st of 194 countries.
Peru has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Peru | South Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 18.8% | 17.6% | 1.3% | Peru |
| 2010s | 17.7% | 17.2% | 0.4% | Peru |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher prevalence of anaemia in pregnant women (aged 15-49), Peru or South Africa?
- South Africa, at 17.8% against 17.6% in Peru as of 2019.
- What is the difference in prevalence of anaemia in pregnant women (aged 15-49) between Peru and South Africa?
- 0.2%, with South Africa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Peru and South Africa?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2019.
- How do Peru and South Africa rank globally for prevalence of anaemia in pregnant women (aged 15-49)?
- Peru ranks 93rd and South Africa ranks 91st of 194 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Prevalence of anaemia in pregnant women (aged 15-49) (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.