Labor force, female, per unit of GDP in OECD members
OECD members: Labor force, female, per unit of GDP was 0 units per US$ of GDP in 2025. ▼ Falling
Labor force, female, per unit of GDP in OECD members, 1990–2025
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in units per US$ of GDP.
Analysis
The most recent figure for labor force, female, per unit of gdp in OECD members is 0 units per US$ of GDP, measured in 2025. That is the lowest value across all 36 years on record.
That represents a change of down 5.4% on the previous year and down 26.5% over ten years.
Over the whole period, labor force, female, per unit of gdp in OECD members peaked at 0 units per US$ of GDP in 1990 and was at its lowest, 0 units per US$ of GDP, in 2025.
OECD members ranks 42nd of 45 groups on this measure, in the bottom quarter.
The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 36 years of available data.
Labor force, female, per unit of GDP in OECD members, year by year
| Year | units per US$ of GDP | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1990 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | — |
| 1991 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -3.9% |
| 1992 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -6.0% |
| 1993 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -1.1% |
| 1994 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -4.4% |
| 1995 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -8.2% |
| 1996 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | +0.6% |
| 1997 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | +3.3% |
| 1998 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | +0.4% |
| 1999 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -3.6% |
| 2000 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -1.3% |
| 2001 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | +1.9% |
| 2002 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -3.0% |
| 2003 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -9.4% |
| 2004 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -9.3% |
| 2005 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -4.0% |
| 2006 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -3.7% |
| 2007 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -7.6% |
| 2008 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -4.5% |
| 2009 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | +8.4% |
| 2010 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -3.9% |
| 2011 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -6.3% |
| 2012 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | +1.4% |
| 2013 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -0.5% |
| 2014 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -1.5% |
| 2015 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | +7.0% |
| 2016 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -0.7% |
| 2017 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -3.1% |
| 2018 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -4.3% |
| 2019 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | +0.4% |
| 2020 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | +0.2% |
| 2021 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -9.0% |
| 2022 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -0.6% |
| 2023 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -4.4% |
| 2024 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -3.0% |
| 2025 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -5.4% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2000s | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2010s | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2020s | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 6 |
Countries ranked near OECD members
- 39 Zimbabwe 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP compare
- 40 Angola 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP compare
- 41 Senegal 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP compare
- 42 Nicaragua 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP compare
- 43 Côte d'Ivoire 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP compare
- 44 Bangladesh 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP compare
- 45 Ghana 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP compare
More gender data for OECD members
- Labor force, female, per capita 0.2268 units per person (2025)
- Labor force, female 318.09 million (2025)
- Labor force, female, per square kilometre 8.86 units per square kilometre (2023)
- Ratio of female to male youth unemployment rate (% ages 15-24) 102.5% (2025)
- School life expectancy, primary to tertiary, male 16.02 years (2019)
- School life expectancy, primary to tertiary, female 16.63 years (2019)
- Proportion of women in ministerial level positions 36.1% (2025)
- Own-account workers, male (% of male employment) 12.3% (2015)
- Own-account workers, female (% of female employment) 8.1% (2015)
- Ratio of female to male youth unemployment rate (%) 105.8% (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is labor force, female, per unit of gdp in OECD members?
- Labor force, female, per unit of gdp in OECD members was 0 units per US$ of GDP in 2025, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest labor force, female, per unit of gdp recorded in OECD members?
- The highest recorded value was 0 units per US$ of GDP in 1990.
- What is the lowest labor force, female, per unit of gdp recorded in OECD members?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 units per US$ of GDP in 2025.
- How does OECD members rank for labor force, female, per unit of gdp?
- OECD members ranks 42nd out of 45 groups with data for 2025.
- Is labor force, female, per unit of gdp rising or falling in OECD members?
- Over the last ten years it is down 26.5%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
- Where does this OECD members data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Labor force, female, per unit of GDP. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 36 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Labor force, female divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Labor force, female ÷ GDP (current US$)
Computed from
- Labor force, female World Bank, World Development Indicators database. Estimates are based on data obtained from International Labour Organization and United Nations Population Division
- GDP Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Labor force, female divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.