Labor force, female, per unit of GDP in IBRD only
IBRD only: Labor force, female, per unit of GDP was 0 units per US$ of GDP in 2025. ◆ Volatile
Labor force, female, per unit of GDP in IBRD only, 1990–2025
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in units per US$ of GDP.
Analysis
In 2025, labor force, female, per unit of gdp in IBRD only stood at 0 units per US$ of GDP. That is the lowest value across all 36 years on record.
The figure is down 4.7% on the previous year and down 33.7% over ten years.
Over the whole period, labor force, female, per unit of gdp in IBRD only peaked at 0.0002 units per US$ of GDP in 1991 and was at its lowest, 0 units per US$ of GDP, in 2025.
That places IBRD only 23rd out of 45 groups with data for 2025, putting it in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Labor force, female, per unit of GDP in IBRD only, year by year
| Year | units per US$ of GDP | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1990 | 0.0002 units per US$ of GDP | — |
| 1991 | 0.0002 units per US$ of GDP | +4.5% |
| 1992 | 0.0002 units per US$ of GDP | -2.7% |
| 1993 | 0.0002 units per US$ of GDP | -5.0% |
| 1994 | 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP | -7.7% |
| 1995 | 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP | -11.4% |
| 1996 | 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP | -6.8% |
| 1997 | 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP | -4.0% |
| 1998 | 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP | +6.1% |
| 1999 | 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP | +4.9% |
| 2000 | 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP | -6.5% |
| 2001 | 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP | +0.1% |
| 2002 | 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP | -0.0% |
| 2003 | 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP | -9.5% |
| 2004 | 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP | -14.7% |
| 2005 | 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP | -14.9% |
| 2006 | 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP | -15.1% |
| 2007 | 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP | -18.7% |
| 2008 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -16.4% |
| 2009 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | +3.6% |
| 2010 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -17.6% |
| 2011 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -14.9% |
| 2012 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -5.3% |
| 2013 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -4.3% |
| 2014 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -1.9% |
| 2015 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | +7.3% |
| 2016 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | +0.2% |
| 2017 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -8.7% |
| 2018 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -5.3% |
| 2019 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -1.3% |
| 2020 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | +1.2% |
| 2021 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -12.6% |
| 2022 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -4.4% |
| 2023 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -0.8% |
| 2024 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -2.8% |
| 2025 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -4.7% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP | 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP | 0.0002 units per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2000s | 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2010s | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2020s | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 6 |
Countries ranked near IBRD only
- 20 Lesotho 0.0002 units per US$ of GDP compare
- 21 Gambia 0.0002 units per US$ of GDP compare
- 22 Benin 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP compare
- 23 Zambia 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP compare
- 24 Togo 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP compare
- 25 Chad 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP compare
- 26 Solomon Islands 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP compare
More gender data for IBRD only
- Labor force, female 909.15 million (2025)
- Labor force, female, per capita 0.1816 units per person (2025)
- Labor force, female, per square kilometre 12.59 units per square kilometre (2023)
- Ratio of female to male youth unemployment rate (% ages 15-24) 117.9% (2025)
- School life expectancy, primary to tertiary, male 13.12 years (2019)
- School life expectancy, primary to tertiary, female 13.53 years (2019)
- Proportion of women in ministerial level positions 21.8% (2025)
- Ratio of female to male youth unemployment rate (%) 129.8% (2022)
- Literacy rate, adult female 87.9% (2024)
- Female migrants 46.5% (2020)
Frequently asked questions
- What is labor force, female, per unit of gdp in IBRD only?
- Labor force, female, per unit of gdp in IBRD only was 0 units per US$ of GDP in 2025, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest labor force, female, per unit of gdp recorded in IBRD only?
- The highest recorded value was 0.0002 units per US$ of GDP in 1991.
- What is the lowest labor force, female, per unit of gdp recorded in IBRD only?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 units per US$ of GDP in 2025.
- How does IBRD only rank for labor force, female, per unit of gdp?
- IBRD only ranks 23rd out of 45 groups with data for 2025.
- Is labor force, female, per unit of gdp rising or falling in IBRD only?
- Over the last ten years it is down 33.7%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this IBRD only data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Labor force, female, per unit of GDP. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 36 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Labor force, female divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Labor force, female ÷ GDP (current US$)
Computed from
- Labor force, female World Bank, World Development Indicators database. Estimates are based on data obtained from International Labour Organization and United Nations Population Division
- GDP Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Labor force, female divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.