Labor force, female, per square kilometre in Tanzania, United Republic of

Tanzania, United Republic of: Labor force, female, per square kilometre was 17.69 units per square kilometre in 2023. ▲ Rising

Latest (2023)
17.69 units per square kilometre
Change on year
up 3.4%
World rank
83rd
of 186 countries
All-time high
17.69 units per square kilometre
in 2023
All-time low
6.75 units per square kilometre
in 1990
Years of data
34
1990–2023

Labor force, female, per square kilometre in Tanzania, United Republic of, 1990–2023

051015201990200620231990: 6.8 units per square kilometre1991: 7 units per square kilometre1992: 7.2 units per square kilometre1993: 7.4 units per square kilometre1994: 7.8 units per square kilometre1995: 8.1 units per square kilometre1996: 8.2 units per square kilometre1997: 8.4 units per square kilometre1998: 8.7 units per square kilometre1999: 8.9 units per square kilometre2000: 9.2 units per square kilometre2001: 9.4 units per square kilometre2002: 9.8 units per square kilometre2003: 10.1 units per square kilometre2004: 10.4 units per square kilometre2005: 10.8 units per square kilometre2006: 11.2 units per square kilometre2007: 11.4 units per square kilometre2008: 11.6 units per square kilometre2009: 11.7 units per square kilometre2010: 11.9 units per square kilometre2011: 12.2 units per square kilometre2012: 12.4 units per square kilometre2013: 12.7 units per square kilometre2014: 12.9 units per square kilometre2015: 13.4 units per square kilometre2016: 13.9 units per square kilometre2017: 14.4 units per square kilometre2018: 15 units per square kilometre2019: 15.5 units per square kilometre2020: 15.8 units per square kilometre2021: 16.6 units per square kilometre2022: 17.1 units per square kilometre2023: 17.7 units per square kilometre

Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in units per square kilometre.

Analysis

In 2023, labor force, female, per square kilometre in Tanzania, United Republic of stood at 17.69 units per square kilometre. That is the highest value across all 34 years on record.

That represents a change of up 3.4% on the previous year and up 39.6% over ten years.

Over the whole period, labor force, female, per square kilometre in Tanzania, United Republic of peaked at 17.69 units per square kilometre in 2023 and was at its lowest, 6.75 units per square kilometre, in 1990.

Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 83rd of 186 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.

The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 34 years of available data.

Labor force, female, per square kilometre in Tanzania, United Republic of, year by year

Annual values for Labor force, female, per square kilometre in Tanzania, United Republic of, 1990 to 2023.
Year units per square kilometre Change
1990 6.75 units per square kilometre
1991 6.96 units per square kilometre +3.0%
1992 7.17 units per square kilometre +3.0%
1993 7.44 units per square kilometre +3.8%
1994 7.79 units per square kilometre +4.6%
1995 8.08 units per square kilometre +3.7%
1996 8.24 units per square kilometre +2.0%
1997 8.42 units per square kilometre +2.2%
1998 8.67 units per square kilometre +2.9%
1999 8.92 units per square kilometre +2.9%
2000 9.19 units per square kilometre +3.0%
2001 9.45 units per square kilometre +2.8%
2002 9.77 units per square kilometre +3.4%
2003 10.1 units per square kilometre +3.4%
2004 10.44 units per square kilometre +3.4%
2005 10.79 units per square kilometre +3.4%
2006 11.16 units per square kilometre +3.4%
2007 11.37 units per square kilometre +1.9%
2008 11.57 units per square kilometre +1.8%
2009 11.74 units per square kilometre +1.5%
2010 11.93 units per square kilometre +1.6%
2011 12.17 units per square kilometre +2.0%
2012 12.41 units per square kilometre +2.0%
2013 12.67 units per square kilometre +2.1%
2014 12.93 units per square kilometre +2.1%
2015 13.41 units per square kilometre +3.6%
2016 13.92 units per square kilometre +3.8%
2017 14.44 units per square kilometre +3.7%
2018 14.95 units per square kilometre +3.5%
2019 15.46 units per square kilometre +3.4%
2020 15.82 units per square kilometre +2.3%
2021 16.59 units per square kilometre +4.9%
2022 17.12 units per square kilometre +3.2%
2023 17.69 units per square kilometre +3.4%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
1990s 7.84 units per square kilometre 6.75 units per square kilometre 8.92 units per square kilometre 10
2000s 10.56 units per square kilometre 9.19 units per square kilometre 11.74 units per square kilometre 10
2010s 13.43 units per square kilometre 11.93 units per square kilometre 15.46 units per square kilometre 10
2020s 16.8 units per square kilometre 15.82 units per square kilometre 17.69 units per square kilometre 4

Countries ranked near Tanzania, United Republic of

  1. 80 Timor-Leste 18.54 units per square kilometre compare
  2. 81 Serbia 18.38 units per square kilometre compare
  3. 82 Costa Rica 18.13 units per square kilometre compare
  4. 84 Brunei Darussalam 17.55 units per square kilometre compare
  5. 85 Sao Tome and Principe 17.18 units per square kilometre compare
  6. 86 Ukraine 16.81 units per square kilometre compare

See the full ranking of 234 places →

More gender data for Tanzania, United Republic of

All data for Tanzania, United Republic of →

Frequently asked questions

What is labor force, female, per square kilometre in Tanzania, United Republic of?
Labor force, female, per square kilometre in Tanzania, United Republic of was 17.69 units per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
What is the highest labor force, female, per square kilometre recorded in Tanzania, United Republic of?
The highest recorded value was 17.69 units per square kilometre in 2023.
What is the lowest labor force, female, per square kilometre recorded in Tanzania, United Republic of?
The lowest recorded value was 6.75 units per square kilometre in 1990.
How does Tanzania, United Republic of rank for labor force, female, per square kilometre?
Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 83rd out of 186 countries with data for 2023.
Is labor force, female, per square kilometre rising or falling in Tanzania, United Republic of?
Over the last ten years it is up 39.6%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
Where does this Tanzania, United Republic of data come from?
The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Labor force, female, per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 34 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Labor force, female, per square kilometre in Tanzania, United Republic of. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 24 August 2026, from https://gender.statizoid.com/stat/labor-force-female-per-square-kilometre/tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://gender.statizoid.com/stat/labor-force-female-per-square-kilometre/tanzania/">Labor force, female, per square kilometre in Tanzania, United Republic of</a> — Statizoid

How this figure is calculated

Labor force, female divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.

Labor force, female ÷ Land area (sq. km)

Computed from

Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.

About this data

Indicator
Labor force, female, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
234 places, 7,804 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

Labor force, female divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.