Key features of womens political empowerment, gaps filled in Lithuania
Lithuania: Key features of womens political empowerment, gaps filled was 0.926 in 2025. ◆ Volatile
Key features of womens political empowerment, gaps filled in Lithuania, 1795–2025
Source: Statizoid (derived).
Analysis
The most recent figure for key features of womens political empowerment, gaps filled in Lithuania is 0.926, measured in 2025.
That represents a change of up 0.2% on the previous year and up 3.3% over ten years.
Over the whole period, key features of womens political empowerment, gaps filled in Lithuania peaked at 0.93 in 2008 and was at its lowest, 0.151, in 1826.
Lithuania ranks 16th of 176 countries on this measure, in the top 10%.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Key features of womens political empowerment, gaps filled in Lithuania, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1795 | 0.158 | — |
| 1796 | 0.158 | +0.0% |
| 1797 | 0.158 | +0.0% |
| 1798 | 0.158 | +0.0% |
| 1799 | 0.158 | +0.0% |
| 1800 | 0.158 | +0.0% |
| 1801 | 0.159 | +0.6% |
| 1802 | 0.159 | +0.0% |
| 1803 | 0.159 | +0.0% |
| 1804 | 0.159 | +0.0% |
| 1805 | 0.159 | +0.0% |
| 1806 | 0.159 | +0.0% |
| 1807 | 0.159 | +0.0% |
| 1808 | 0.159 | +0.0% |
| 1809 | 0.159 | +0.0% |
| 1810 | 0.159 | +0.0% |
| 1811 | 0.159 | +0.0% |
| 1812 | 0.159 | +0.0% |
| 1813 | 0.159 | +0.0% |
| 1814 | 0.159 | +0.0% |
| 1815 | 0.159 | +0.0% |
| 1816 | 0.159 | +0.0% |
| 1817 | 0.159 | +0.0% |
| 1818 | 0.159 | +0.0% |
| 1819 | 0.159 | +0.0% |
| 1820 | 0.159 | +0.0% |
| 1821 | 0.159 | +0.0% |
| 1822 | 0.159 | +0.0% |
| 1823 | 0.159 | +0.0% |
| 1824 | 0.159 | +0.0% |
| 1825 | 0.159 | +0.0% |
| 1826 | 0.151 | -5.0% |
| 1827 | 0.151 | +0.0% |
| 1828 | 0.151 | +0.0% |
| 1829 | 0.151 | +0.0% |
| 1830 | 0.151 | +0.0% |
| 1831 | 0.151 | +0.0% |
| 1832 | 0.151 | +0.0% |
| 1833 | 0.151 | +0.0% |
| 1834 | 0.151 | +0.0% |
| 1835 | 0.151 | +0.0% |
| 1836 | 0.151 | +0.0% |
| 1837 | 0.151 | +0.0% |
| 1838 | 0.151 | +0.0% |
| 1839 | 0.151 | +0.0% |
| 1840 | 0.151 | +0.0% |
| 1841 | 0.151 | +0.0% |
| 1842 | 0.151 | +0.0% |
| 1843 | 0.151 | +0.0% |
| 1844 | 0.151 | +0.0% |
| 1845 | 0.151 | +0.0% |
| 1846 | 0.151 | +0.0% |
| 1847 | 0.151 | +0.0% |
| 1848 | 0.162 | +7.3% |
| 1849 | 0.162 | +0.0% |
| 1850 | 0.162 | +0.0% |
| 1851 | 0.162 | +0.0% |
| 1852 | 0.162 | +0.0% |
| 1853 | 0.162 | +0.0% |
| 1854 | 0.162 | +0.0% |
| 1855 | 0.182 | +12.3% |
| 1856 | 0.182 | +0.0% |
| 1857 | 0.182 | +0.0% |
| 1858 | 0.182 | +0.0% |
| 1859 | 0.182 | +0.0% |
| 1860 | 0.182 | +0.0% |
| 1861 | 0.182 | +0.0% |
| 1862 | 0.182 | +0.0% |
| 1863 | 0.182 | +0.0% |
| 1864 | 0.182 | +0.0% |
| 1865 | 0.201 | +10.4% |
| 1866 | 0.201 | +0.0% |
| 1867 | 0.201 | +0.0% |
| 1868 | 0.201 | +0.0% |
| 1869 | 0.201 | +0.0% |
| 1870 | 0.201 | +0.0% |
| 1871 | 0.201 | +0.0% |
| 1872 | 0.201 | +0.0% |
| 1873 | 0.201 | +0.0% |
| 1874 | 0.219 | +9.0% |
| 1875 | 0.219 | +0.0% |
| 1876 | 0.219 | +0.0% |
| 1877 | 0.219 | +0.0% |
| 1878 | 0.219 | +0.0% |
| 1879 | 0.219 | +0.0% |
| 1880 | 0.219 | +0.0% |
| 1881 | 0.215 | -1.8% |
| 1882 | 0.215 | +0.0% |
| 1883 | 0.215 | +0.0% |
| 1884 | 0.215 | +0.0% |
| 1885 | 0.215 | +0.0% |
| 1886 | 0.215 | +0.0% |
| 1887 | 0.215 | +0.0% |
| 1888 | 0.215 | +0.0% |
| 1889 | 0.215 | +0.0% |
| 1890 | 0.215 | +0.0% |
| 1891 | 0.215 | +0.0% |
| 1892 | 0.215 | +0.0% |
| 1893 | 0.215 | +0.0% |
| 1894 | 0.233 | +8.4% |
| 1895 | 0.233 | +0.0% |
| 1896 | 0.233 | +0.0% |
| 1897 | 0.233 | +0.0% |
| 1898 | 0.233 | +0.0% |
| 1899 | 0.233 | +0.0% |
| 1900 | 0.216 | -7.3% |
| 1901 | 0.222 | +2.8% |
| 1902 | 0.222 | +0.0% |
| 1903 | 0.222 | +0.0% |
| 1904 | 0.222 | +0.0% |
| 1905 | 0.233 | +5.0% |
| 1906 | 0.257 | +10.3% |
| 1907 | 0.258 | +0.4% |
| 1908 | 0.26 | +0.8% |
| 1909 | 0.26 | +0.0% |
| 1910 | 0.258 | -0.8% |
| 1911 | 0.258 | +0.0% |
| 1912 | 0.258 | +0.0% |
| 1913 | 0.258 | +0.0% |
| 1914 | 0.263 | +1.9% |
| 1915 | 0.246 | -6.5% |
| 1916 | 0.246 | +0.0% |
| 1917 | 0.29 | +17.9% |
| 1918 | 0.492 | +69.7% |
| 1919 | 0.509 | +3.5% |
| 1920 | 0.509 | +0.0% |
| 1921 | 0.517 | +1.6% |
| 1922 | 0.518 | +0.2% |
| 1923 | 0.525 | +1.4% |
| 1924 | 0.529 | +0.8% |
| 1925 | 0.518 | -2.1% |
| 1926 | 0.5 | -3.5% |
| 1927 | 0.465 | -7.0% |
| 1928 | 0.465 | +0.0% |
| 1929 | 0.466 | +0.2% |
| 1930 | 0.466 | +0.0% |
| 1931 | 0.466 | +0.0% |
| 1932 | 0.466 | +0.0% |
| 1933 | 0.466 | +0.0% |
| 1934 | 0.466 | +0.0% |
| 1935 | 0.466 | +0.0% |
| 1936 | 0.466 | +0.0% |
| 1937 | 0.466 | +0.0% |
| 1938 | 0.471 | +1.1% |
| 1939 | 0.472 | +0.2% |
| 1946 | 0.344 | -27.1% |
| 1947 | 0.344 | +0.0% |
| 1948 | 0.333 | -3.2% |
| 1949 | 0.332 | -0.3% |
| 1950 | 0.347 | +4.5% |
| 1951 | 0.347 | +0.0% |
| 1952 | 0.347 | +0.0% |
| 1953 | 0.358 | +3.2% |
| 1954 | 0.426 | +19.0% |
| 1955 | 0.43 | +0.9% |
| 1956 | 0.445 | +3.5% |
| 1957 | 0.446 | +0.2% |
| 1958 | 0.454 | +1.8% |
| 1959 | 0.454 | +0.0% |
| 1960 | 0.462 | +1.8% |
| 1961 | 0.462 | +0.0% |
| 1962 | 0.468 | +1.3% |
| 1963 | 0.468 | +0.0% |
| 1964 | 0.468 | +0.0% |
| 1965 | 0.48 | +2.6% |
| 1966 | 0.485 | +1.0% |
| 1967 | 0.491 | +1.2% |
| 1968 | 0.487 | -0.8% |
| 1969 | 0.478 | -1.8% |
| 1970 | 0.482 | +0.8% |
| 1971 | 0.481 | -0.2% |
| 1972 | 0.477 | -0.8% |
| 1973 | 0.481 | +0.8% |
| 1974 | 0.488 | +1.5% |
| 1975 | 0.484 | -0.8% |
| 1976 | 0.485 | +0.2% |
| 1977 | 0.478 | -1.4% |
| 1978 | 0.478 | +0.0% |
| 1979 | 0.482 | +0.8% |
| 1980 | 0.482 | +0.0% |
| 1981 | 0.482 | +0.0% |
| 1982 | 0.482 | +0.0% |
| 1983 | 0.482 | +0.0% |
| 1984 | 0.48 | -0.4% |
| 1985 | 0.496 | +3.3% |
| 1986 | 0.531 | +7.1% |
| 1987 | 0.525 | -1.1% |
| 1988 | 0.534 | +1.7% |
| 1989 | 0.497 | -6.9% |
| 1990 | 0.784 | +57.7% |
| 1991 | 0.833 | +6.2% |
| 1992 | 0.826 | -0.8% |
| 1993 | 0.827 | +0.1% |
| 1994 | 0.827 | +0.0% |
| 1995 | 0.827 | +0.0% |
| 1996 | 0.879 | +6.3% |
| 1997 | 0.889 | +1.1% |
| 1998 | 0.889 | +0.0% |
| 1999 | 0.889 | +0.0% |
| 2000 | 0.861 | -3.1% |
| 2001 | 0.865 | +0.5% |
| 2002 | 0.865 | +0.0% |
| 2003 | 0.865 | +0.0% |
| 2004 | 0.921 | +6.5% |
| 2005 | 0.921 | +0.0% |
| 2006 | 0.927 | +0.7% |
| 2007 | 0.924 | -0.3% |
| 2008 | 0.93 | +0.6% |
| 2009 | 0.917 | -1.4% |
| 2010 | 0.917 | +0.0% |
| 2011 | 0.914 | -0.3% |
| 2012 | 0.925 | +1.2% |
| 2013 | 0.902 | -2.5% |
| 2014 | 0.9 | -0.2% |
| 2015 | 0.896 | -0.4% |
| 2016 | 0.897 | +0.1% |
| 2017 | 0.919 | +2.5% |
| 2018 | 0.916 | -0.3% |
| 2019 | 0.914 | -0.2% |
| 2020 | 0.918 | +0.4% |
| 2021 | 0.91 | -0.9% |
| 2022 | 0.928 | +2.0% |
| 2023 | 0.923 | -0.5% |
| 2024 | 0.924 | +0.1% |
| 2025 | 0.926 | +0.2% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1790s | 0.158 | 0.158 | 0.158 | 5 |
| 1800s | 0.1589 | 0.158 | 0.159 | 10 |
| 1810s | 0.159 | 0.159 | 0.159 | 10 |
| 1820s | 0.1558 | 0.151 | 0.159 | 10 |
| 1830s | 0.151 | 0.151 | 0.151 | 10 |
| 1840s | 0.1532 | 0.151 | 0.162 | 10 |
| 1850s | 0.172 | 0.162 | 0.182 | 10 |
| 1860s | 0.1915 | 0.182 | 0.201 | 10 |
| 1870s | 0.2118 | 0.201 | 0.219 | 10 |
| 1880s | 0.2154 | 0.215 | 0.219 | 10 |
| 1890s | 0.2258 | 0.215 | 0.233 | 10 |
| 1900s | 0.2372 | 0.216 | 0.26 | 10 |
| 1910s | 0.3078 | 0.246 | 0.509 | 10 |
| 1920s | 0.5012 | 0.465 | 0.529 | 10 |
| 1930s | 0.4671 | 0.466 | 0.472 | 10 |
| 1940s | 0.3382 | 0.332 | 0.344 | 4 |
| 1950s | 0.4054 | 0.347 | 0.454 | 10 |
| 1960s | 0.4749 | 0.462 | 0.491 | 10 |
| 1970s | 0.4816 | 0.477 | 0.488 | 10 |
| 1980s | 0.4991 | 0.48 | 0.534 | 10 |
| 1990s | 0.847 | 0.784 | 0.889 | 10 |
| 2000s | 0.8996 | 0.861 | 0.93 | 10 |
| 2010s | 0.91 | 0.896 | 0.925 | 10 |
| 2020s | 0.9215 | 0.91 | 0.928 | 6 |
Countries ranked near Lithuania
More gender data for Lithuania
- Child population (UN estimates and projections) 361.11 (2030)
- Child population (UN estimates and projections) (0-14), annual growth -2.94 % change on previous year (2030)
- Age population, age 00, female, interpolated 10,620 (2025)
- Age population, age 00, male, interpolated 11,194 (2025)
- Age population, age 01, female, interpolated 10,662 (2025)
- Age population, age 01, male, interpolated 11,224 (2025)
- Age population, age 02, female, interpolated 10,961 (2025)
- Age population, age 02, male, interpolated 11,508 (2025)
- Age population, age 03, female, interpolated 11,616 (2025)
- Age population, age 03, male, interpolated 12,180 (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is key features of womens political empowerment, gaps filled in Lithuania?
- Key features of womens political empowerment, gaps filled in Lithuania was 0.926 in 2025, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest key features of womens political empowerment, gaps filled recorded in Lithuania?
- The highest recorded value was 0.93 in 2008.
- What is the lowest key features of womens political empowerment, gaps filled recorded in Lithuania?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.151 in 1826.
- How does Lithuania rank for key features of womens political empowerment, gaps filled?
- Lithuania ranks 16th out of 176 countries with data for 2025.
- Is key features of womens political empowerment, gaps filled rising or falling in Lithuania?
- Over the last ten years it is up 3.3%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Lithuania data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Key features of womens political empowerment, gaps filled. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 225 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Key features of womens political empowerment with 68 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.
Computed from
- Key features of women's political empowerment V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Key features of womens political empowerment with 68 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.