Key features of womens political empowerment, gaps filled in Latvia
Latvia: Key features of womens political empowerment, gaps filled was 0.95 in 2025. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2025)
0.95
Change on year
down 0.1%
World rank
3rd
of 176 countries
All-time high
0.952
in 2021
All-time low
0.151
in 1826
Years of data
220
1789–2025
Key features of womens political empowerment, gaps filled in Latvia, 1789–2025
Source: Statizoid (derived).
Analysis
The most recent figure for key features of womens political empowerment, gaps filled in Latvia is 0.95, measured in 2025.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 0.1% on the previous year and up 1.8% over ten years.
Over the whole period, key features of womens political empowerment, gaps filled in Latvia peaked at 0.952 in 2021 and was at its lowest, 0.151, in 1826.
Latvia ranks 3rd of 176 countries on this measure, in the top 10%.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Key features of womens political empowerment, gaps filled in Latvia, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1789 | 0.172 | — |
| 1790 | 0.158 | -8.1% |
| 1791 | 0.158 | +0.0% |
| 1792 | 0.158 | +0.0% |
| 1793 | 0.158 | +0.0% |
| 1794 | 0.158 | +0.0% |
| 1795 | 0.158 | +0.0% |
| 1796 | 0.158 | +0.0% |
| 1797 | 0.158 | +0.0% |
| 1798 | 0.158 | +0.0% |
| 1799 | 0.158 | +0.0% |
| 1800 | 0.158 | +0.0% |
| 1801 | 0.159 | +0.6% |
| 1802 | 0.159 | +0.0% |
| 1803 | 0.159 | +0.0% |
| 1804 | 0.159 | +0.0% |
| 1805 | 0.159 | +0.0% |
| 1806 | 0.159 | +0.0% |
| 1807 | 0.159 | +0.0% |
| 1808 | 0.159 | +0.0% |
| 1809 | 0.159 | +0.0% |
| 1810 | 0.159 | +0.0% |
| 1811 | 0.159 | +0.0% |
| 1812 | 0.159 | +0.0% |
| 1813 | 0.159 | +0.0% |
| 1814 | 0.159 | +0.0% |
| 1815 | 0.159 | +0.0% |
| 1816 | 0.159 | +0.0% |
| 1817 | 0.159 | +0.0% |
| 1818 | 0.159 | +0.0% |
| 1819 | 0.159 | +0.0% |
| 1820 | 0.159 | +0.0% |
| 1821 | 0.159 | +0.0% |
| 1822 | 0.159 | +0.0% |
| 1823 | 0.159 | +0.0% |
| 1824 | 0.159 | +0.0% |
| 1825 | 0.159 | +0.0% |
| 1826 | 0.151 | -5.0% |
| 1827 | 0.151 | +0.0% |
| 1828 | 0.151 | +0.0% |
| 1829 | 0.151 | +0.0% |
| 1830 | 0.151 | +0.0% |
| 1831 | 0.151 | +0.0% |
| 1832 | 0.151 | +0.0% |
| 1833 | 0.151 | +0.0% |
| 1834 | 0.151 | +0.0% |
| 1835 | 0.151 | +0.0% |
| 1836 | 0.151 | +0.0% |
| 1837 | 0.151 | +0.0% |
| 1838 | 0.151 | +0.0% |
| 1839 | 0.151 | +0.0% |
| 1840 | 0.151 | +0.0% |
| 1841 | 0.151 | +0.0% |
| 1842 | 0.151 | +0.0% |
| 1843 | 0.151 | +0.0% |
| 1844 | 0.151 | +0.0% |
| 1845 | 0.151 | +0.0% |
| 1846 | 0.151 | +0.0% |
| 1847 | 0.151 | +0.0% |
| 1848 | 0.162 | +7.3% |
| 1849 | 0.162 | +0.0% |
| 1850 | 0.162 | +0.0% |
| 1851 | 0.162 | +0.0% |
| 1852 | 0.162 | +0.0% |
| 1853 | 0.162 | +0.0% |
| 1854 | 0.162 | +0.0% |
| 1855 | 0.182 | +12.3% |
| 1856 | 0.182 | +0.0% |
| 1857 | 0.182 | +0.0% |
| 1858 | 0.182 | +0.0% |
| 1859 | 0.182 | +0.0% |
| 1860 | 0.182 | +0.0% |
| 1861 | 0.182 | +0.0% |
| 1862 | 0.182 | +0.0% |
| 1863 | 0.182 | +0.0% |
| 1864 | 0.182 | +0.0% |
| 1865 | 0.201 | +10.4% |
| 1866 | 0.201 | +0.0% |
| 1867 | 0.201 | +0.0% |
| 1868 | 0.201 | +0.0% |
| 1869 | 0.201 | +0.0% |
| 1870 | 0.201 | +0.0% |
| 1871 | 0.201 | +0.0% |
| 1872 | 0.201 | +0.0% |
| 1873 | 0.201 | +0.0% |
| 1874 | 0.219 | +9.0% |
| 1875 | 0.219 | +0.0% |
| 1876 | 0.219 | +0.0% |
| 1877 | 0.219 | +0.0% |
| 1878 | 0.219 | +0.0% |
| 1879 | 0.219 | +0.0% |
| 1880 | 0.219 | +0.0% |
| 1881 | 0.215 | -1.8% |
| 1882 | 0.215 | +0.0% |
| 1883 | 0.215 | +0.0% |
| 1884 | 0.215 | +0.0% |
| 1885 | 0.215 | +0.0% |
| 1886 | 0.215 | +0.0% |
| 1887 | 0.215 | +0.0% |
| 1888 | 0.215 | +0.0% |
| 1889 | 0.215 | +0.0% |
| 1890 | 0.215 | +0.0% |
| 1891 | 0.215 | +0.0% |
| 1892 | 0.215 | +0.0% |
| 1893 | 0.215 | +0.0% |
| 1894 | 0.233 | +8.4% |
| 1895 | 0.233 | +0.0% |
| 1896 | 0.233 | +0.0% |
| 1897 | 0.233 | +0.0% |
| 1898 | 0.233 | +0.0% |
| 1899 | 0.233 | +0.0% |
| 1900 | 0.216 | -7.3% |
| 1901 | 0.222 | +2.8% |
| 1902 | 0.222 | +0.0% |
| 1903 | 0.222 | +0.0% |
| 1904 | 0.222 | +0.0% |
| 1905 | 0.233 | +5.0% |
| 1906 | 0.257 | +10.3% |
| 1907 | 0.258 | +0.4% |
| 1908 | 0.26 | +0.8% |
| 1909 | 0.26 | +0.0% |
| 1910 | 0.258 | -0.8% |
| 1911 | 0.258 | +0.0% |
| 1912 | 0.258 | +0.0% |
| 1913 | 0.258 | +0.0% |
| 1914 | 0.263 | +1.9% |
| 1915 | 0.246 | -6.5% |
| 1916 | 0.246 | +0.0% |
| 1917 | 0.29 | +17.9% |
| 1918 | 0.281 | -3.1% |
| 1919 | 0.299 | +6.4% |
| 1920 | 0.625 | +109.0% |
| 1921 | 0.625 | +0.0% |
| 1922 | 0.625 | +0.0% |
| 1934 | 0.583 | -6.7% |
| 1935 | 0.556 | -4.6% |
| 1936 | 0.556 | +0.0% |
| 1937 | 0.556 | +0.0% |
| 1938 | 0.556 | +0.0% |
| 1939 | 0.556 | +0.0% |
| 1946 | 0.344 | -38.1% |
| 1947 | 0.344 | +0.0% |
| 1948 | 0.333 | -3.2% |
| 1949 | 0.332 | -0.3% |
| 1950 | 0.347 | +4.5% |
| 1951 | 0.347 | +0.0% |
| 1952 | 0.347 | +0.0% |
| 1953 | 0.358 | +3.2% |
| 1954 | 0.426 | +19.0% |
| 1955 | 0.43 | +0.9% |
| 1956 | 0.445 | +3.5% |
| 1957 | 0.446 | +0.2% |
| 1958 | 0.454 | +1.8% |
| 1959 | 0.454 | +0.0% |
| 1960 | 0.462 | +1.8% |
| 1961 | 0.462 | +0.0% |
| 1962 | 0.468 | +1.3% |
| 1963 | 0.468 | +0.0% |
| 1964 | 0.468 | +0.0% |
| 1965 | 0.48 | +2.6% |
| 1966 | 0.485 | +1.0% |
| 1967 | 0.491 | +1.2% |
| 1968 | 0.487 | -0.8% |
| 1969 | 0.478 | -1.8% |
| 1970 | 0.482 | +0.8% |
| 1971 | 0.481 | -0.2% |
| 1972 | 0.477 | -0.8% |
| 1973 | 0.481 | +0.8% |
| 1974 | 0.488 | +1.5% |
| 1975 | 0.484 | -0.8% |
| 1976 | 0.485 | +0.2% |
| 1977 | 0.478 | -1.4% |
| 1978 | 0.478 | +0.0% |
| 1979 | 0.482 | +0.8% |
| 1980 | 0.482 | +0.0% |
| 1981 | 0.482 | +0.0% |
| 1982 | 0.482 | +0.0% |
| 1983 | 0.482 | +0.0% |
| 1984 | 0.48 | -0.4% |
| 1985 | 0.496 | +3.3% |
| 1986 | 0.531 | +7.1% |
| 1987 | 0.525 | -1.1% |
| 1988 | 0.534 | +1.7% |
| 1989 | 0.497 | -6.9% |
| 1990 | 0.735 | +47.9% |
| 1991 | 0.7907 | +7.6% |
| 1992 | 0.8463 | +7.0% |
| 1993 | 0.902 | +6.6% |
| 1994 | 0.907 | +0.6% |
| 1995 | 0.89 | -1.9% |
| 1996 | 0.89 | +0.0% |
| 1997 | 0.89 | +0.0% |
| 1998 | 0.917 | +3.0% |
| 1999 | 0.92 | +0.3% |
| 2000 | 0.92 | +0.0% |
| 2001 | 0.92 | +0.0% |
| 2002 | 0.922 | +0.2% |
| 2003 | 0.929 | +0.8% |
| 2004 | 0.934 | +0.5% |
| 2005 | 0.934 | +0.0% |
| 2006 | 0.931 | -0.3% |
| 2007 | 0.932 | +0.1% |
| 2008 | 0.932 | +0.0% |
| 2009 | 0.935 | +0.3% |
| 2010 | 0.937 | +0.2% |
| 2011 | 0.942 | +0.5% |
| 2012 | 0.94 | -0.2% |
| 2013 | 0.938 | -0.2% |
| 2014 | 0.933 | -0.5% |
| 2015 | 0.933 | +0.0% |
| 2016 | 0.924 | -1.0% |
| 2017 | 0.938 | +1.5% |
| 2018 | 0.949 | +1.2% |
| 2019 | 0.947 | -0.2% |
| 2020 | 0.945 | -0.2% |
| 2021 | 0.952 | +0.7% |
| 2022 | 0.952 | +0.0% |
| 2023 | 0.946 | -0.6% |
| 2024 | 0.951 | +0.5% |
| 2025 | 0.95 | -0.1% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1780s | 0.172 | 0.172 | 0.172 | 1 |
| 1790s | 0.158 | 0.158 | 0.158 | 10 |
| 1800s | 0.1589 | 0.158 | 0.159 | 10 |
| 1810s | 0.159 | 0.159 | 0.159 | 10 |
| 1820s | 0.1558 | 0.151 | 0.159 | 10 |
| 1830s | 0.151 | 0.151 | 0.151 | 10 |
| 1840s | 0.1532 | 0.151 | 0.162 | 10 |
| 1850s | 0.172 | 0.162 | 0.182 | 10 |
| 1860s | 0.1915 | 0.182 | 0.201 | 10 |
| 1870s | 0.2118 | 0.201 | 0.219 | 10 |
| 1880s | 0.2154 | 0.215 | 0.219 | 10 |
| 1890s | 0.2258 | 0.215 | 0.233 | 10 |
| 1900s | 0.2372 | 0.216 | 0.26 | 10 |
| 1910s | 0.2657 | 0.246 | 0.299 | 10 |
| 1920s | 0.625 | 0.625 | 0.625 | 3 |
| 1930s | 0.5605 | 0.556 | 0.583 | 6 |
| 1940s | 0.3382 | 0.332 | 0.344 | 4 |
| 1950s | 0.4054 | 0.347 | 0.454 | 10 |
| 1960s | 0.4749 | 0.462 | 0.491 | 10 |
| 1970s | 0.4816 | 0.477 | 0.488 | 10 |
| 1980s | 0.4991 | 0.48 | 0.534 | 10 |
| 1990s | 0.8688 | 0.735 | 0.92 | 10 |
| 2000s | 0.9289 | 0.92 | 0.935 | 10 |
| 2010s | 0.9381 | 0.924 | 0.949 | 10 |
| 2020s | 0.9493 | 0.945 | 0.952 | 6 |
Countries ranked near Latvia
More gender data for Latvia
- Child population (UN estimates and projections) 242.79 (2030)
- Child population (UN estimates and projections) (0-14), annual growth -3.87 % change on previous year (2030)
- Age population, age 00, female, interpolated 6,644 (2025)
- Age population, age 00, male, interpolated 7,068 (2025)
- Age population, age 01, female, interpolated 6,775 (2025)
- Age population, age 01, male, interpolated 7,216 (2025)
- Age population, age 02, female, interpolated 7,299 (2025)
- Age population, age 02, male, interpolated 7,779 (2025)
- Age population, age 03, female, interpolated 8,130 (2025)
- Age population, age 03, male, interpolated 8,665 (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is key features of womens political empowerment, gaps filled in Latvia?
- Key features of womens political empowerment, gaps filled in Latvia was 0.95 in 2025, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest key features of womens political empowerment, gaps filled recorded in Latvia?
- The highest recorded value was 0.952 in 2021.
- What is the lowest key features of womens political empowerment, gaps filled recorded in Latvia?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.151 in 1826.
- How does Latvia rank for key features of womens political empowerment, gaps filled?
- Latvia ranks 3rd out of 176 countries with data for 2025.
- Is key features of womens political empowerment, gaps filled rising or falling in Latvia?
- Over the last ten years it is up 1.8%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Latvia data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Key features of womens political empowerment, gaps filled. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 220 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Key features of womens political empowerment with 68 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.
Computed from
- Key features of women's political empowerment V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Key features of womens political empowerment with 68 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.