Key features of womens political empowerment, annual growth rate in Timor-Leste
Timor-Leste: Key features of womens political empowerment, annual growth rate was 0 % change on previous year in 2025. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2025)
0 % change on previous year
Change on year
down 100.0%
World rank
69th
of 176 countries
All-time high
138.05 % change on previous year
in 2000
All-time low
-23.41 % change on previous year
in 1976
Years of data
121
1901–2025
Key features of womens political empowerment, annual growth rate in Timor-Leste, 1901–2025
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in % change on previous year.
Analysis
In 2025, key features of womens political empowerment, annual growth rate in Timor-Leste stood at 0 % change on previous year.
The figure is down 100.0% on the previous year and up 100.0% over ten years.
Over the whole period, key features of womens political empowerment, annual growth rate in Timor-Leste peaked at 138.05 % change on previous year in 2000 and was at its lowest, -23.41 % change on previous year, in 1976.
That places Timor-Leste 69th out of 176 countries with data for 2025, putting it in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Key features of womens political empowerment, annual growth rate in Timor-Leste, year by year
| Year | % change on previous year | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1901 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1902 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1903 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1904 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1905 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1906 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1907 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1908 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1909 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1910 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1911 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1912 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1913 | 4.94 % change on previous year | — |
| 1914 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 1915 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1916 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1917 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1918 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1919 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1920 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1921 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1922 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1923 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1924 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1925 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1926 | -2.35 % change on previous year | — |
| 1927 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 1928 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1929 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1930 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1931 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1932 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1933 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1934 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1935 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1936 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1937 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1938 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1939 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1940 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1941 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1942 | -13.25 % change on previous year | — |
| 1943 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 1944 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1945 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1946 | 23.61 % change on previous year | — |
| 1947 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 1948 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1949 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1950 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1951 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1952 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1953 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1954 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1955 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1956 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1957 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1958 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1959 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1960 | 7.87 % change on previous year | — |
| 1961 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 1962 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1963 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1964 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1965 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1966 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1967 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1968 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1969 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1970 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1971 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1972 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1973 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1976 | -23.41 % change on previous year | — |
| 1977 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 1978 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1979 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1980 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1981 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1982 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1983 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1984 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1985 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1986 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1987 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1988 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1989 | 7.25 % change on previous year | — |
| 1990 | 4.35 % change on previous year | -40.1% |
| 1991 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 1992 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1993 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1994 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1995 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1996 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1997 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1998 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1999 | 4.63 % change on previous year | — |
| 2000 | 138.05 % change on previous year | +2881.9% |
| 2001 | 7.62 % change on previous year | -94.5% |
| 2004 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 2005 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 2006 | 0.6878 % change on previous year | — |
| 2007 | 2.87 % change on previous year | +317.1% |
| 2008 | 0.1328 % change on previous year | -95.4% |
| 2009 | 0.2653 % change on previous year | +99.7% |
| 2010 | -0.1323 % change on previous year | -149.9% |
| 2011 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 2012 | 2.38 % change on previous year | — |
| 2013 | 0.6468 % change on previous year | -72.9% |
| 2014 | -3.73 % change on previous year | -676.3% |
| 2015 | -1.34 % change on previous year | -64.2% |
| 2016 | 1.22 % change on previous year | -191.2% |
| 2017 | -2.94 % change on previous year | -341.5% |
| 2018 | 1.79 % change on previous year | -160.9% |
| 2019 | 1.35 % change on previous year | -24.4% |
| 2020 | -2.14 % change on previous year | -257.9% |
| 2021 | 0.2729 % change on previous year | -112.8% |
| 2022 | 2.72 % change on previous year | +897.3% |
| 2023 | 0.2649 % change on previous year | -90.3% |
| 2024 | 1.45 % change on previous year | +448.5% |
| 2025 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1900s | 0 % change on previous year | 0 % change on previous year | 0 % change on previous year | 9 |
| 1910s | 0.4938 % change on previous year | 0 % change on previous year | 4.94 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1920s | -0.2353 % change on previous year | -2.35 % change on previous year | 0 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1930s | 0 % change on previous year | 0 % change on previous year | 0 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1940s | 1.04 % change on previous year | -13.25 % change on previous year | 23.61 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1950s | 0 % change on previous year | 0 % change on previous year | 0 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1960s | 0.7865 % change on previous year | 0 % change on previous year | 7.87 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1970s | -2.93 % change on previous year | -23.41 % change on previous year | 0 % change on previous year | 8 |
| 1980s | 0.7254 % change on previous year | 0 % change on previous year | 7.25 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1990s | 0.8977 % change on previous year | 0 % change on previous year | 4.63 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 2000s | 18.7 % change on previous year | 0 % change on previous year | 138.05 % change on previous year | 8 |
| 2010s | -0.0743 % change on previous year | -3.73 % change on previous year | 2.38 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 2020s | 0.4293 % change on previous year | -2.14 % change on previous year | 2.72 % change on previous year | 6 |
Countries ranked near Timor-Leste
- 66 Kenya 0.1245 % change on previous year compare
- 67 Malta 0.1092 % change on previous year compare
- 68 Slovenia 0.1065 % change on previous year compare
- 69 Belgium 0 % change on previous year compare
- 69 Barbados 0 % change on previous year compare
- 69 China 0 % change on previous year compare
- 69 Dominican Republic 0 % change on previous year compare
- 69 Algeria 0 % change on previous year compare
- 69 France 0 % change on previous year compare
- 69 Malaysia 0 % change on previous year compare
- 69 New Zealand 0 % change on previous year compare
- 69 Papua New Guinea 0 % change on previous year compare
- 69 Korea, Democratic People's Republic of 0 % change on previous year compare
- 69 Palestine, State of 0 % change on previous year
- 69 Solomon Islands 0 % change on previous year compare
- 69 Vatican 0 % change on previous year
More gender data for Timor-Leste
- Child population (UN estimates and projections) 462.75 (2030)
- Child population (UN estimates and projections) (0-14), annual growth -0.4702 % change on previous year (2030)
- Population 1,057 (2030)
- Working-age population (UN estimates and projections) 1,057 (2030)
- Population (UN estimates and projections), annual growth rate 2.31 % change on previous year (2030)
- Age population, age 00, female, interpolated 14,331 (2025)
- Age population, age 00, male, interpolated 15,248 (2025)
- Age population, age 01, female, interpolated 14,172 (2025)
- Age population, age 01, male, interpolated 15,056 (2025)
- Age population, age 02, female, interpolated 14,127 (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is key features of womens political empowerment, annual growth rate in Timor-Leste?
- Key features of womens political empowerment, annual growth rate in Timor-Leste was 0 % change on previous year in 2025, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest key features of womens political empowerment, annual growth rate recorded in Timor-Leste?
- The highest recorded value was 138.05 % change on previous year in 2000.
- What is the lowest key features of womens political empowerment, annual growth rate recorded in Timor-Leste?
- The lowest recorded value was -23.41 % change on previous year in 1976.
- How does Timor-Leste rank for key features of womens political empowerment, annual growth rate?
- Timor-Leste ranks 69th out of 176 countries with data for 2025.
- Is key features of womens political empowerment, annual growth rate rising or falling in Timor-Leste?
- Over the last ten years it is up 100.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Timor-Leste data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Key features of womens political empowerment, annual growth rate. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 121 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
The year-on-year percentage change in Key features of womens political empowerment. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.
Computed from
- Key features of women's political empowerment V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Key features of womens political empowerment. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.