Key features of womens political empowerment, annual growth rate in Suriname
Suriname: Key features of womens political empowerment, annual growth rate was -2.34 % change on previous year in 2025. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2025)
-2.34 % change on previous year
Change on year
down 307.7%
World rank
143rd
of 176 countries
All-time high
12.79 % change on previous year
in 1985
All-time low
-9.7 % change on previous year
in 1980
Years of data
125
1901–2025
Key features of womens political empowerment, annual growth rate in Suriname, 1901–2025
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in % change on previous year.
Analysis
Suriname recorded -2.34 % change on previous year for key features of womens political empowerment, annual growth rate in 2025.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 307.7% on the previous year and down 145.8% over ten years.
Over the whole period, key features of womens political empowerment, annual growth rate in Suriname peaked at 12.79 % change on previous year in 1985 and was at its lowest, -9.7 % change on previous year, in 1980.
That places Suriname 143rd out of 176 countries with data for 2025, putting it in the bottom quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Key features of womens political empowerment, annual growth rate in Suriname, year by year
| Year | % change on previous year | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1901 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1902 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1903 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1904 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1905 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1906 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1907 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1908 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1909 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1910 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1911 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1912 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1913 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1914 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1915 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1916 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1917 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1918 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1919 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1920 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1921 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1922 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1923 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1924 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1925 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1926 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1927 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1928 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1929 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1930 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1931 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1932 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1933 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1934 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1935 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1936 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1937 | 4.83 % change on previous year | — |
| 1938 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 1939 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1940 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1941 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1942 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1943 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1944 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1945 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1946 | 1.1 % change on previous year | — |
| 1947 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 1948 | 6.72 % change on previous year | — |
| 1949 | 12.6 % change on previous year | +87.4% |
| 1950 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 1951 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1952 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1953 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1954 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1955 | 1.08 % change on previous year | — |
| 1956 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 1957 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1958 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1959 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1960 | 1.07 % change on previous year | — |
| 1961 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 1962 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1963 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1964 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1965 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1966 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1967 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1968 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1969 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1970 | 3.89 % change on previous year | — |
| 1971 | -5.78 % change on previous year | -248.8% |
| 1972 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 1973 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1974 | 2.71 % change on previous year | — |
| 1975 | 11.07 % change on previous year | +308.9% |
| 1976 | 4.43 % change on previous year | -60.0% |
| 1977 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 1978 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1979 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1980 | -9.7 % change on previous year | — |
| 1981 | 1.34 % change on previous year | -113.8% |
| 1982 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 1983 | -0.3311 % change on previous year | — |
| 1984 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 1985 | 12.79 % change on previous year | — |
| 1986 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 1987 | -3.98 % change on previous year | — |
| 1988 | 6.44 % change on previous year | -262.0% |
| 1989 | 2.88 % change on previous year | -55.3% |
| 1990 | -3.5 % change on previous year | -221.5% |
| 1991 | 2.32 % change on previous year | -166.3% |
| 1992 | 6.81 % change on previous year | +193.2% |
| 1993 | 3.32 % change on previous year | -51.2% |
| 1994 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 1995 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1996 | 5.4 % change on previous year | — |
| 1997 | 0.4878 % change on previous year | -91.0% |
| 1998 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 1999 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 2000 | 2.06 % change on previous year | — |
| 2001 | -0.4756 % change on previous year | -123.1% |
| 2002 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 2003 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 2004 | 0.7168 % change on previous year | — |
| 2005 | 1.42 % change on previous year | +98.6% |
| 2006 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 2007 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 2008 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 2009 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 2010 | -5.61 % change on previous year | — |
| 2011 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 2012 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 2013 | -1.49 % change on previous year | — |
| 2014 | 1.01 % change on previous year | -167.7% |
| 2015 | 5.11 % change on previous year | +407.4% |
| 2016 | 0.5924 % change on previous year | -88.4% |
| 2017 | -0.1178 % change on previous year | -119.9% |
| 2018 | 0.2358 % change on previous year | -300.2% |
| 2019 | -1.88 % change on previous year | -898.1% |
| 2020 | 0.4796 % change on previous year | -125.5% |
| 2021 | 3.94 % change on previous year | +721.1% |
| 2022 | -2.53 % change on previous year | -164.1% |
| 2023 | 4.59 % change on previous year | -281.9% |
| 2024 | 1.13 % change on previous year | -75.5% |
| 2025 | -2.34 % change on previous year | -307.7% |
Suriname compared with similar countries
- Suriname's -2.34 % change on previous year is below the median for upper middle income countries, which is -1.09 % change on previous year, 2.1× the median. (48 countries reporting)
- Suriname's -2.34 % change on previous year is below the median for Latin America & Caribbean, which is -0.978 % change on previous year, 2.4× the median. (25 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1900s | 0 % change on previous year | 0 % change on previous year | 0 % change on previous year | 9 |
| 1910s | 0 % change on previous year | 0 % change on previous year | 0 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1920s | 0 % change on previous year | 0 % change on previous year | 0 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1930s | 0.4828 % change on previous year | 0 % change on previous year | 4.83 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1940s | 2.04 % change on previous year | 0 % change on previous year | 12.6 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1950s | 0.1083 % change on previous year | 0 % change on previous year | 1.08 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1960s | 0.1071 % change on previous year | 0 % change on previous year | 1.07 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1970s | 1.63 % change on previous year | -5.78 % change on previous year | 11.07 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1980s | 0.9452 % change on previous year | -9.7 % change on previous year | 12.79 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1990s | 1.48 % change on previous year | -3.5 % change on previous year | 6.81 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 2000s | 0.3728 % change on previous year | -0.4756 % change on previous year | 2.06 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 2010s | -0.2161 % change on previous year | -5.61 % change on previous year | 5.11 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 2020s | 0.8788 % change on previous year | -2.53 % change on previous year | 4.59 % change on previous year | 6 |
Countries ranked near Suriname
- 140 Burkina Faso -2.11 % change on previous year compare
- 141 Iran -2.14 % change on previous year compare
- 142 Kuwait -2.19 % change on previous year compare
- 144 Zambia -2.35 % change on previous year compare
- 145 Turkey -2.45 % change on previous year compare
- 146 El Salvador -2.49 % change on previous year compare
More gender data for Suriname
- Child population (UN estimates and projections) 158.99 (2030)
- Child population (UN estimates and projections) (0-14), annual growth -0.4271 % change on previous year (2030)
- Population 506.66 (2030)
- Working-age population (UN estimates and projections) 506.66 (2030)
- Population (UN estimates and projections), annual growth rate 1.11 % change on previous year (2030)
- Age population, age 00, female, interpolated 5,273 (2025)
- Age population, age 00, male, interpolated 5,469 (2025)
- Age population, age 01, female, interpolated 5,254 (2025)
- Age population, age 01, male, interpolated 5,447 (2025)
- Age population, age 02, female, interpolated 5,239 (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is key features of womens political empowerment, annual growth rate in Suriname?
- Key features of womens political empowerment, annual growth rate in Suriname was -2.34 % change on previous year in 2025, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest key features of womens political empowerment, annual growth rate recorded in Suriname?
- The highest recorded value was 12.79 % change on previous year in 1985.
- What is the lowest key features of womens political empowerment, annual growth rate recorded in Suriname?
- The lowest recorded value was -9.7 % change on previous year in 1980.
- How does Suriname rank for key features of womens political empowerment, annual growth rate?
- Suriname ranks 143rd out of 176 countries with data for 2025.
- Is key features of womens political empowerment, annual growth rate rising or falling in Suriname?
- Over the last ten years it is down 145.8%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Suriname data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Key features of womens political empowerment, annual growth rate. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 125 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
The year-on-year percentage change in Key features of womens political empowerment. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.
Computed from
- Key features of women's political empowerment V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Key features of womens political empowerment. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.