Key features of womens political empowerment, annual growth rate in Lithuania
Lithuania: Key features of womens political empowerment, annual growth rate was 0.2165 % change on previous year in 2025. ◆ Volatile
Key features of womens political empowerment, annual growth rate in Lithuania, 1796–2025
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in % change on previous year.
Analysis
Lithuania recorded 0.2165 % change on previous year for key features of womens political empowerment, annual growth rate in 2025.
That represents a change of up 99.8% on the previous year and up 148.7% over ten years.
Over the whole period, key features of womens political empowerment, annual growth rate in Lithuania peaked at 69.66 % change on previous year in 1918 and was at its lowest, -7.3 % change on previous year, in 1900.
Lithuania ranks 62nd of 176 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Key features of womens political empowerment, annual growth rate in Lithuania, year by year
| Year | % change on previous year | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1796 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1797 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1798 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1799 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1800 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1801 | 0.6329 % change on previous year | — |
| 1802 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 1803 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1804 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1805 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1806 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1807 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1808 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1809 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1810 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1811 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1812 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1813 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1814 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1815 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1816 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1817 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1818 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1819 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1820 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1821 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1822 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1823 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1824 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1825 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1826 | -5.03 % change on previous year | — |
| 1827 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 1828 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1829 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1830 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1831 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1832 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1833 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1834 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1835 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1836 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1837 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1838 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1839 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1840 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1841 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1842 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1843 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1844 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1845 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1846 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1847 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1848 | 7.28 % change on previous year | — |
| 1849 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 1850 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1851 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1852 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1853 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1854 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1855 | 12.35 % change on previous year | — |
| 1856 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 1857 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1858 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1859 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1860 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1861 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1862 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1863 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1864 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1865 | 10.44 % change on previous year | — |
| 1866 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 1867 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1868 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1869 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1870 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1871 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1872 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1873 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1874 | 8.96 % change on previous year | — |
| 1875 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 1876 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1877 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1878 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1879 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1880 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1881 | -1.83 % change on previous year | — |
| 1882 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 1883 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1884 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1885 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1886 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1887 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1888 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1889 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1890 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1891 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1892 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1893 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1894 | 8.37 % change on previous year | — |
| 1895 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 1896 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1897 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1898 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1899 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1900 | -7.3 % change on previous year | — |
| 1901 | 2.78 % change on previous year | -138.1% |
| 1902 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 1903 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1904 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1905 | 4.95 % change on previous year | — |
| 1906 | 10.3 % change on previous year | +107.9% |
| 1907 | 0.3891 % change on previous year | -96.2% |
| 1908 | 0.7752 % change on previous year | +99.2% |
| 1909 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 1910 | -0.7692 % change on previous year | — |
| 1911 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 1912 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1913 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1914 | 1.94 % change on previous year | — |
| 1915 | -6.46 % change on previous year | -433.5% |
| 1916 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 1917 | 17.89 % change on previous year | — |
| 1918 | 69.66 % change on previous year | +289.4% |
| 1919 | 3.46 % change on previous year | -95.0% |
| 1920 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 1921 | 1.57 % change on previous year | — |
| 1922 | 0.1934 % change on previous year | -87.7% |
| 1923 | 1.35 % change on previous year | +598.6% |
| 1924 | 0.7619 % change on previous year | -43.6% |
| 1925 | -2.08 % change on previous year | -372.9% |
| 1926 | -3.47 % change on previous year | +67.1% |
| 1927 | -7 % change on previous year | +101.4% |
| 1928 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 1929 | 0.2151 % change on previous year | — |
| 1930 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 1931 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1932 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1933 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1934 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1935 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1936 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1937 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1938 | 1.07 % change on previous year | — |
| 1939 | 0.2123 % change on previous year | -80.2% |
| 1947 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 1948 | -3.2 % change on previous year | — |
| 1949 | -0.3003 % change on previous year | -90.6% |
| 1950 | 4.52 % change on previous year | -1604.5% |
| 1951 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 1952 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1953 | 3.17 % change on previous year | — |
| 1954 | 18.99 % change on previous year | +499.2% |
| 1955 | 0.939 % change on previous year | -95.1% |
| 1956 | 3.49 % change on previous year | +271.5% |
| 1957 | 0.2247 % change on previous year | -93.6% |
| 1958 | 1.79 % change on previous year | +698.2% |
| 1959 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 1960 | 1.76 % change on previous year | — |
| 1961 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 1962 | 1.3 % change on previous year | — |
| 1963 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 1964 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1965 | 2.56 % change on previous year | — |
| 1966 | 1.04 % change on previous year | -59.4% |
| 1967 | 1.24 % change on previous year | +18.8% |
| 1968 | -0.8147 % change on previous year | -165.9% |
| 1969 | -1.85 % change on previous year | +126.8% |
| 1970 | 0.8368 % change on previous year | -145.3% |
| 1971 | -0.2075 % change on previous year | -124.8% |
| 1972 | -0.8316 % change on previous year | +300.8% |
| 1973 | 0.8386 % change on previous year | -200.8% |
| 1974 | 1.46 % change on previous year | +73.5% |
| 1975 | -0.8197 % change on previous year | -156.3% |
| 1976 | 0.2066 % change on previous year | -125.2% |
| 1977 | -1.44 % change on previous year | -798.6% |
| 1978 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 1979 | 0.8368 % change on previous year | — |
| 1980 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 1981 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1982 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1983 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1984 | -0.4149 % change on previous year | — |
| 1985 | 3.33 % change on previous year | -903.3% |
| 1986 | 7.06 % change on previous year | +111.7% |
| 1987 | -1.13 % change on previous year | -116.0% |
| 1988 | 1.71 % change on previous year | -251.7% |
| 1989 | -6.93 % change on previous year | -504.2% |
| 1990 | 57.75 % change on previous year | -933.4% |
| 1991 | 6.25 % change on previous year | -89.2% |
| 1992 | -0.8403 % change on previous year | -113.4% |
| 1993 | 0.1211 % change on previous year | -114.4% |
| 1994 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 1995 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1996 | 6.29 % change on previous year | — |
| 1997 | 1.14 % change on previous year | -81.9% |
| 1998 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 1999 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 2000 | -3.15 % change on previous year | — |
| 2001 | 0.4646 % change on previous year | -114.8% |
| 2002 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 2003 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 2004 | 6.47 % change on previous year | — |
| 2005 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 2006 | 0.6515 % change on previous year | — |
| 2007 | -0.3236 % change on previous year | -149.7% |
| 2008 | 0.6494 % change on previous year | -300.6% |
| 2009 | -1.4 % change on previous year | -315.3% |
| 2010 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 2011 | -0.3272 % change on previous year | — |
| 2012 | 1.2 % change on previous year | -467.9% |
| 2013 | -2.49 % change on previous year | -306.6% |
| 2014 | -0.2217 % change on previous year | -91.1% |
| 2015 | -0.4444 % change on previous year | +100.4% |
| 2016 | 0.1116 % change on previous year | -125.1% |
| 2017 | 2.45 % change on previous year | +2097.6% |
| 2018 | -0.3264 % change on previous year | -113.3% |
| 2019 | -0.2183 % change on previous year | -33.1% |
| 2020 | 0.4376 % change on previous year | -300.4% |
| 2021 | -0.8715 % change on previous year | -299.1% |
| 2022 | 1.98 % change on previous year | -327.0% |
| 2023 | -0.5388 % change on previous year | -127.2% |
| 2024 | 0.1083 % change on previous year | -120.1% |
| 2025 | 0.2165 % change on previous year | +99.8% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1790s | 0 % change on previous year | 0 % change on previous year | 0 % change on previous year | 4 |
| 1800s | 0.0633 % change on previous year | 0 % change on previous year | 0.6329 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1810s | 0 % change on previous year | 0 % change on previous year | 0 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1820s | -0.5031 % change on previous year | -5.03 % change on previous year | 0 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1830s | 0 % change on previous year | 0 % change on previous year | 0 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1840s | 0.7285 % change on previous year | 0 % change on previous year | 7.28 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1850s | 1.23 % change on previous year | 0 % change on previous year | 12.35 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1860s | 1.04 % change on previous year | 0 % change on previous year | 10.44 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1870s | 0.8955 % change on previous year | 0 % change on previous year | 8.96 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1880s | -0.1826 % change on previous year | -1.83 % change on previous year | 0 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1890s | 0.8372 % change on previous year | 0 % change on previous year | 8.37 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1900s | 1.19 % change on previous year | -7.3 % change on previous year | 10.3 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1910s | 8.57 % change on previous year | -6.46 % change on previous year | 69.66 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1920s | -0.8461 % change on previous year | -7 % change on previous year | 1.57 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1930s | 0.1285 % change on previous year | 0 % change on previous year | 1.07 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1940s | -1.17 % change on previous year | -3.2 % change on previous year | 0 % change on previous year | 3 |
| 1950s | 3.31 % change on previous year | 0 % change on previous year | 18.99 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1960s | 0.5241 % change on previous year | -1.85 % change on previous year | 2.56 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1970s | 0.0872 % change on previous year | -1.44 % change on previous year | 1.46 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1980s | 0.363 % change on previous year | -6.93 % change on previous year | 7.06 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1990s | 7.07 % change on previous year | -0.8403 % change on previous year | 57.75 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 2000s | 0.3368 % change on previous year | -3.15 % change on previous year | 6.47 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 2010s | -0.0257 % change on previous year | -2.49 % change on previous year | 2.45 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 2020s | 0.2217 % change on previous year | -0.8715 % change on previous year | 1.98 % change on previous year | 6 |
Countries ranked near Lithuania
- 59 Namibia 0.2345 % change on previous year compare
- 60 Republic of Moldova 0.2232 % change on previous year compare
- 61 Netherlands 0.222 % change on previous year compare
- 63 Comoros 0.1802 % change on previous year compare
- 64 Lebanon 0.1647 % change on previous year compare
- 65 Hong Kong, China 0.125 % change on previous year compare
More gender data for Lithuania
- Child population (UN estimates and projections) 361.11 (2030)
- Child population (UN estimates and projections) (0-14), annual growth -2.94 % change on previous year (2030)
- Population 2,345 (2030)
- Working-age population (UN estimates and projections) 2,345 (2030)
- Age population, age 00, female, interpolated 10,620 (2025)
- Age population, age 00, male, interpolated 11,194 (2025)
- Age population, age 01, female, interpolated 10,662 (2025)
- Age population, age 01, male, interpolated 11,224 (2025)
- Age population, age 02, female, interpolated 10,961 (2025)
- Age population, age 02, male, interpolated 11,508 (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is key features of womens political empowerment, annual growth rate in Lithuania?
- Key features of womens political empowerment, annual growth rate in Lithuania was 0.2165 % change on previous year in 2025, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest key features of womens political empowerment, annual growth rate recorded in Lithuania?
- The highest recorded value was 69.66 % change on previous year in 1918.
- What is the lowest key features of womens political empowerment, annual growth rate recorded in Lithuania?
- The lowest recorded value was -7.3 % change on previous year in 1900.
- How does Lithuania rank for key features of womens political empowerment, annual growth rate?
- Lithuania ranks 62nd out of 176 countries with data for 2025.
- Is key features of womens political empowerment, annual growth rate rising or falling in Lithuania?
- Over the last ten years it is up 148.7%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Lithuania data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Key features of womens political empowerment, annual growth rate. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 223 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
The year-on-year percentage change in Key features of womens political empowerment. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.
Computed from
- Key features of women's political empowerment V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Key features of womens political empowerment. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.