Key features of womens political empowerment, annual growth rate in Latvia
Latvia: Key features of womens political empowerment, annual growth rate was -0.1052 % change on previous year in 2025. ◆ Volatile
Key features of womens political empowerment, annual growth rate in Latvia, 1790–2025
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in % change on previous year.
Analysis
The most recent figure for key features of womens political empowerment, annual growth rate in Latvia is -0.1052 % change on previous year, measured in 2025.
That represents a change of down 119.9% on the previous year and up 50.2% over five years.
Over the whole period, key features of womens political empowerment, annual growth rate in Latvia peaked at 109.03 % change on previous year in 1920 and was at its lowest, -8.14 % change on previous year, in 1790.
Latvia ranks 83rd of 176 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Key features of womens political empowerment, annual growth rate in Latvia, year by year
| Year | % change on previous year | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1790 | -8.14 % change on previous year | — |
| 1791 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 1792 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1793 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1794 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1795 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1796 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1797 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1798 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1799 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1800 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1801 | 0.6329 % change on previous year | — |
| 1802 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 1803 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1804 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1805 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1806 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1807 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1808 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1809 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1810 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1811 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1812 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1813 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1814 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1815 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1816 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1817 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1818 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1819 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1820 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1821 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1822 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1823 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1824 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1825 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1826 | -5.03 % change on previous year | — |
| 1827 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 1828 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1829 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1830 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1831 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1832 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1833 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1834 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1835 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1836 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1837 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1838 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1839 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1840 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1841 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1842 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1843 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1844 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1845 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1846 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1847 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1848 | 7.28 % change on previous year | — |
| 1849 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 1850 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1851 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1852 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1853 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1854 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1855 | 12.35 % change on previous year | — |
| 1856 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 1857 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1858 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1859 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1860 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1861 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1862 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1863 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1864 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1865 | 10.44 % change on previous year | — |
| 1866 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 1867 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1868 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1869 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1870 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1871 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1872 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1873 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1874 | 8.96 % change on previous year | — |
| 1875 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 1876 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1877 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1878 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1879 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1880 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1881 | -1.83 % change on previous year | — |
| 1882 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 1883 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1884 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1885 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1886 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1887 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1888 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1889 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1890 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1891 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1892 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1893 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1894 | 8.37 % change on previous year | — |
| 1895 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 1896 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1897 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1898 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1899 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1900 | -7.3 % change on previous year | — |
| 1901 | 2.78 % change on previous year | -138.1% |
| 1902 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 1903 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1904 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1905 | 4.95 % change on previous year | — |
| 1906 | 10.3 % change on previous year | +107.9% |
| 1907 | 0.3891 % change on previous year | -96.2% |
| 1908 | 0.7752 % change on previous year | +99.2% |
| 1909 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 1910 | -0.7692 % change on previous year | — |
| 1911 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 1912 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1913 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1914 | 1.94 % change on previous year | — |
| 1915 | -6.46 % change on previous year | -433.5% |
| 1916 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 1917 | 17.89 % change on previous year | — |
| 1918 | -3.1 % change on previous year | -117.4% |
| 1919 | 6.41 % change on previous year | -306.4% |
| 1920 | 109.03 % change on previous year | +1602.1% |
| 1921 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 1922 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1935 | -4.63 % change on previous year | — |
| 1936 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 1937 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1938 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1939 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1947 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1948 | -3.2 % change on previous year | — |
| 1949 | -0.3003 % change on previous year | -90.6% |
| 1950 | 4.52 % change on previous year | -1604.5% |
| 1951 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 1952 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1953 | 3.17 % change on previous year | — |
| 1954 | 18.99 % change on previous year | +499.2% |
| 1955 | 0.939 % change on previous year | -95.1% |
| 1956 | 3.49 % change on previous year | +271.5% |
| 1957 | 0.2247 % change on previous year | -93.6% |
| 1958 | 1.79 % change on previous year | +698.2% |
| 1959 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 1960 | 1.76 % change on previous year | — |
| 1961 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 1962 | 1.3 % change on previous year | — |
| 1963 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 1964 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1965 | 2.56 % change on previous year | — |
| 1966 | 1.04 % change on previous year | -59.4% |
| 1967 | 1.24 % change on previous year | +18.8% |
| 1968 | -0.8147 % change on previous year | -165.9% |
| 1969 | -1.85 % change on previous year | +126.8% |
| 1970 | 0.8368 % change on previous year | -145.3% |
| 1971 | -0.2075 % change on previous year | -124.8% |
| 1972 | -0.8316 % change on previous year | +300.8% |
| 1973 | 0.8386 % change on previous year | -200.8% |
| 1974 | 1.46 % change on previous year | +73.5% |
| 1975 | -0.8197 % change on previous year | -156.3% |
| 1976 | 0.2066 % change on previous year | -125.2% |
| 1977 | -1.44 % change on previous year | -798.6% |
| 1978 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 1979 | 0.8368 % change on previous year | — |
| 1980 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 1981 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1982 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1983 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1984 | -0.4149 % change on previous year | — |
| 1985 | 3.33 % change on previous year | -903.3% |
| 1986 | 7.06 % change on previous year | +111.7% |
| 1987 | -1.13 % change on previous year | -116.0% |
| 1988 | 1.71 % change on previous year | -251.7% |
| 1989 | -6.93 % change on previous year | -504.2% |
| 1990 | 47.89 % change on previous year | -791.1% |
| 1994 | 0.5543 % change on previous year | -98.8% |
| 1995 | -1.87 % change on previous year | -438.1% |
| 1996 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 1997 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1998 | 3.03 % change on previous year | — |
| 1999 | 0.3272 % change on previous year | -89.2% |
| 2000 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 2001 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 2002 | 0.2174 % change on previous year | — |
| 2003 | 0.7592 % change on previous year | +249.2% |
| 2004 | 0.5382 % change on previous year | -29.1% |
| 2005 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 2006 | -0.3212 % change on previous year | — |
| 2007 | 0.1074 % change on previous year | -133.4% |
| 2008 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 2009 | 0.3219 % change on previous year | — |
| 2010 | 0.2139 % change on previous year | -33.5% |
| 2011 | 0.5336 % change on previous year | +149.5% |
| 2012 | -0.2123 % change on previous year | -139.8% |
| 2013 | -0.2128 % change on previous year | +0.2% |
| 2014 | -0.533 % change on previous year | +150.5% |
| 2015 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 2016 | -0.9646 % change on previous year | — |
| 2017 | 1.52 % change on previous year | -257.1% |
| 2018 | 1.17 % change on previous year | -22.6% |
| 2019 | -0.2107 % change on previous year | -118.0% |
| 2020 | -0.2112 % change on previous year | +0.2% |
| 2021 | 0.7407 % change on previous year | -450.7% |
| 2022 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 2023 | -0.6303 % change on previous year | — |
| 2024 | 0.5285 % change on previous year | -183.9% |
| 2025 | -0.1052 % change on previous year | -119.9% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1790s | -0.814 % change on previous year | -8.14 % change on previous year | 0 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1800s | 0.0633 % change on previous year | 0 % change on previous year | 0.6329 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1810s | 0 % change on previous year | 0 % change on previous year | 0 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1820s | -0.5031 % change on previous year | -5.03 % change on previous year | 0 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1830s | 0 % change on previous year | 0 % change on previous year | 0 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1840s | 0.7285 % change on previous year | 0 % change on previous year | 7.28 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1850s | 1.23 % change on previous year | 0 % change on previous year | 12.35 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1860s | 1.04 % change on previous year | 0 % change on previous year | 10.44 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1870s | 0.8955 % change on previous year | 0 % change on previous year | 8.96 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1880s | -0.1826 % change on previous year | -1.83 % change on previous year | 0 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1890s | 0.8372 % change on previous year | 0 % change on previous year | 8.37 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1900s | 1.19 % change on previous year | -7.3 % change on previous year | 10.3 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1910s | 1.59 % change on previous year | -6.46 % change on previous year | 17.89 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1920s | 36.34 % change on previous year | 0 % change on previous year | 109.03 % change on previous year | 3 |
| 1930s | -0.9262 % change on previous year | -4.63 % change on previous year | 0 % change on previous year | 5 |
| 1940s | -1.17 % change on previous year | -3.2 % change on previous year | 0 % change on previous year | 3 |
| 1950s | 3.31 % change on previous year | 0 % change on previous year | 18.99 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1960s | 0.5241 % change on previous year | -1.85 % change on previous year | 2.56 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1970s | 0.0872 % change on previous year | -1.44 % change on previous year | 1.46 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1980s | 0.363 % change on previous year | -6.93 % change on previous year | 7.06 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1990s | 7.13 % change on previous year | -1.87 % change on previous year | 47.89 % change on previous year | 7 |
| 2000s | 0.1623 % change on previous year | -0.3212 % change on previous year | 0.7592 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 2010s | 0.1302 % change on previous year | -0.9646 % change on previous year | 1.52 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 2020s | 0.0538 % change on previous year | -0.6303 % change on previous year | 0.7407 % change on previous year | 6 |
Countries ranked near Latvia
More gender data for Latvia
- Child population (UN estimates and projections) 242.79 (2030)
- Child population (UN estimates and projections) (0-14), annual growth -3.87 % change on previous year (2030)
- Population 1,535 (2030)
- Working-age population (UN estimates and projections) 1,535 (2030)
- Population (UN estimates and projections), annual growth rate -0.3312 % change on previous year (2030)
- Age population, age 00, female, interpolated 6,644 (2025)
- Age population, age 00, male, interpolated 7,068 (2025)
- Age population, age 01, female, interpolated 6,775 (2025)
- Age population, age 01, male, interpolated 7,216 (2025)
- Age population, age 02, female, interpolated 7,299 (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is key features of womens political empowerment, annual growth rate in Latvia?
- Key features of womens political empowerment, annual growth rate in Latvia was -0.1052 % change on previous year in 2025, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest key features of womens political empowerment, annual growth rate recorded in Latvia?
- The highest recorded value was 109.03 % change on previous year in 1920.
- What is the lowest key features of womens political empowerment, annual growth rate recorded in Latvia?
- The lowest recorded value was -8.14 % change on previous year in 1790.
- How does Latvia rank for key features of womens political empowerment, annual growth rate?
- Latvia ranks 83rd out of 176 countries with data for 2025.
- Where does this Latvia data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Key features of womens political empowerment, annual growth rate. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 214 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
The year-on-year percentage change in Key features of womens political empowerment. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.
Computed from
- Key features of women's political empowerment V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Key features of womens political empowerment. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.