Key features of womens political empowerment, annual growth rate in Kazakhstan
Kazakhstan: Key features of womens political empowerment, annual growth rate was -6.32 % change on previous year in 2025. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2025)
-6.32 % change on previous year
Change on year
down 76.7%
World rank
170th
of 176 countries
All-time high
38.63 % change on previous year
in 1990
All-time low
-15.22 % change on previous year
in 1929
Years of data
223
1790–2025
Key features of womens political empowerment, annual growth rate in Kazakhstan, 1790–2025
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in % change on previous year.
Analysis
The most recent figure for key features of womens political empowerment, annual growth rate in Kazakhstan is -6.32 % change on previous year, measured in 2025.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 76.7% on the previous year and down 548.1% over five years.
Over the whole period, key features of womens political empowerment, annual growth rate in Kazakhstan peaked at 38.63 % change on previous year in 1990 and was at its lowest, -15.22 % change on previous year, in 1929.
That places Kazakhstan 170th out of 176 countries with data for 2025, putting it in the bottom quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Key features of womens political empowerment, annual growth rate in Kazakhstan, year by year
| Year | % change on previous year | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1790 | -8.14 % change on previous year | — |
| 1791 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 1792 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1793 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1794 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1795 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1796 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1797 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1798 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1799 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1800 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1801 | 0.6329 % change on previous year | — |
| 1802 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 1803 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1804 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1805 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1806 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1807 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1808 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1809 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1810 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1811 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1812 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1813 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1814 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1815 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1816 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1817 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1818 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1819 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1820 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1821 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1822 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1823 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1824 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1825 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1826 | -5.03 % change on previous year | — |
| 1827 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 1828 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1829 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1830 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1831 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1832 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1833 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1834 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1835 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1836 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1837 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1838 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1839 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1840 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1841 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1842 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1843 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1844 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1845 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1846 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1847 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1848 | 7.28 % change on previous year | — |
| 1849 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 1850 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1851 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1852 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1853 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1854 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1855 | 12.35 % change on previous year | — |
| 1856 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 1857 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1858 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1859 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1860 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1861 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1862 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1863 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1864 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1865 | 10.44 % change on previous year | — |
| 1866 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 1867 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1868 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1869 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1870 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1871 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1872 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1873 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1874 | 8.96 % change on previous year | — |
| 1875 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 1876 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1877 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1878 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1879 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1880 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1881 | -1.83 % change on previous year | — |
| 1882 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 1883 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1884 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1885 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1886 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1887 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1888 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1889 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1890 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1891 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1892 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1893 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1894 | 8.37 % change on previous year | — |
| 1895 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 1896 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1897 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1898 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1899 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1900 | -7.3 % change on previous year | — |
| 1901 | 2.78 % change on previous year | -138.1% |
| 1902 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 1903 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1904 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1905 | 4.95 % change on previous year | — |
| 1906 | 10.3 % change on previous year | +107.9% |
| 1907 | 0.3891 % change on previous year | -96.2% |
| 1908 | 0.7752 % change on previous year | +99.2% |
| 1909 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 1910 | -0.7692 % change on previous year | — |
| 1911 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 1912 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1913 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1914 | 1.94 % change on previous year | — |
| 1915 | -6.46 % change on previous year | -433.5% |
| 1916 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 1917 | 17.89 % change on previous year | — |
| 1918 | -3.1 % change on previous year | -117.4% |
| 1919 | 6.41 % change on previous year | -306.4% |
| 1920 | -1.34 % change on previous year | -120.9% |
| 1921 | 0.339 % change on previous year | -125.3% |
| 1922 | 1.35 % change on previous year | +298.6% |
| 1923 | 0.6667 % change on previous year | -50.7% |
| 1924 | -0.6623 % change on previous year | -199.3% |
| 1925 | -0.6667 % change on previous year | +0.7% |
| 1926 | -3.02 % change on previous year | +353.0% |
| 1927 | 0.346 % change on previous year | -111.5% |
| 1928 | -0.3448 % change on previous year | -199.7% |
| 1929 | -15.22 % change on previous year | +4315.2% |
| 1930 | -5.71 % change on previous year | -62.5% |
| 1931 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 1932 | -0.4329 % change on previous year | — |
| 1933 | -1.3 % change on previous year | +201.3% |
| 1947 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 1948 | -3.2 % change on previous year | — |
| 1949 | -0.3003 % change on previous year | -90.6% |
| 1950 | 4.52 % change on previous year | -1604.5% |
| 1951 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 1952 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1953 | 3.17 % change on previous year | — |
| 1954 | 18.99 % change on previous year | +499.2% |
| 1955 | 0.939 % change on previous year | -95.1% |
| 1956 | 3.49 % change on previous year | +271.5% |
| 1957 | 0.2247 % change on previous year | -93.6% |
| 1958 | 1.79 % change on previous year | +698.2% |
| 1959 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 1960 | 1.76 % change on previous year | — |
| 1961 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 1962 | 1.3 % change on previous year | — |
| 1963 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 1964 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1965 | 2.56 % change on previous year | — |
| 1966 | 1.04 % change on previous year | -59.4% |
| 1967 | 1.24 % change on previous year | +18.8% |
| 1968 | -0.8147 % change on previous year | -165.9% |
| 1969 | -1.85 % change on previous year | +126.8% |
| 1970 | 0.8368 % change on previous year | -145.3% |
| 1971 | -0.2075 % change on previous year | -124.8% |
| 1972 | -0.8316 % change on previous year | +300.8% |
| 1973 | 0.8386 % change on previous year | -200.8% |
| 1974 | 1.46 % change on previous year | +73.5% |
| 1975 | -0.8197 % change on previous year | -156.3% |
| 1976 | 0.2066 % change on previous year | -125.2% |
| 1977 | -1.44 % change on previous year | -798.6% |
| 1978 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 1979 | 0.8368 % change on previous year | — |
| 1980 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 1981 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1982 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1983 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1984 | -0.4149 % change on previous year | — |
| 1985 | 3.33 % change on previous year | -903.3% |
| 1986 | 7.06 % change on previous year | +111.7% |
| 1987 | -1.13 % change on previous year | -116.0% |
| 1988 | 1.71 % change on previous year | -251.7% |
| 1989 | -6.93 % change on previous year | -504.2% |
| 1990 | 38.63 % change on previous year | -657.6% |
| 1991 | 6.24 % change on previous year | -83.8% |
| 1992 | -1.78 % change on previous year | -128.5% |
| 1993 | -0.1391 % change on previous year | -92.2% |
| 1994 | 4.18 % change on previous year | -3104.2% |
| 1995 | 0.4011 % change on previous year | -90.4% |
| 1996 | 1.07 % change on previous year | +165.6% |
| 1997 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 1998 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1999 | -2.11 % change on previous year | — |
| 2000 | -0.1346 % change on previous year | -93.6% |
| 2001 | 0.9434 % change on previous year | -800.9% |
| 2002 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 2003 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 2004 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 2005 | -1.2 % change on previous year | — |
| 2006 | 0.4054 % change on previous year | -133.7% |
| 2007 | 3.1 % change on previous year | +663.6% |
| 2008 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 2009 | 1.04 % change on previous year | — |
| 2010 | -0.1292 % change on previous year | -112.4% |
| 2011 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 2012 | 2.98 % change on previous year | — |
| 2013 | -2.14 % change on previous year | -171.8% |
| 2014 | 0.6418 % change on previous year | -130.1% |
| 2015 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 2016 | 1.91 % change on previous year | — |
| 2017 | -2.25 % change on previous year | -217.7% |
| 2018 | -1.79 % change on previous year | -20.4% |
| 2019 | 1.69 % change on previous year | -194.6% |
| 2020 | 1.41 % change on previous year | -16.8% |
| 2021 | 0.6321 % change on previous year | -55.2% |
| 2022 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 2023 | -5.15 % change on previous year | — |
| 2024 | -3.58 % change on previous year | -30.6% |
| 2025 | -6.32 % change on previous year | +76.7% |
Kazakhstan compared with similar countries
- Kazakhstan's -6.32 % change on previous year is below the median for upper middle income countries, which is -1.09 % change on previous year, 5.8× the median. (48 countries reporting)
- Kazakhstan's -6.32 % change on previous year is below the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is -0.111 % change on previous year, 56.9× the median. (48 countries reporting)
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Key features of womens political empowerment, annual growth rate in Kazakhstan changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1929 | -4315.2% | -0.3448 % change on previous year | -15.22 % change on previous year |
| 1994 | +3104.2% | -0.1391 % change on previous year | 4.18 % change on previous year |
| 1950 | +1604.5% | -0.3003 % change on previous year | 4.52 % change on previous year |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1790s | -0.814 % change on previous year | -8.14 % change on previous year | 0 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1800s | 0.0633 % change on previous year | 0 % change on previous year | 0.6329 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1810s | 0 % change on previous year | 0 % change on previous year | 0 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1820s | -0.5031 % change on previous year | -5.03 % change on previous year | 0 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1830s | 0 % change on previous year | 0 % change on previous year | 0 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1840s | 0.7285 % change on previous year | 0 % change on previous year | 7.28 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1850s | 1.23 % change on previous year | 0 % change on previous year | 12.35 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1860s | 1.04 % change on previous year | 0 % change on previous year | 10.44 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1870s | 0.8955 % change on previous year | 0 % change on previous year | 8.96 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1880s | -0.1826 % change on previous year | -1.83 % change on previous year | 0 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1890s | 0.8372 % change on previous year | 0 % change on previous year | 8.37 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1900s | 1.19 % change on previous year | -7.3 % change on previous year | 10.3 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1910s | 1.59 % change on previous year | -6.46 % change on previous year | 17.89 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1920s | -1.86 % change on previous year | -15.22 % change on previous year | 1.35 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1930s | -1.86 % change on previous year | -5.71 % change on previous year | 0 % change on previous year | 4 |
| 1940s | -1.17 % change on previous year | -3.2 % change on previous year | 0 % change on previous year | 3 |
| 1950s | 3.31 % change on previous year | 0 % change on previous year | 18.99 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1960s | 0.5241 % change on previous year | -1.85 % change on previous year | 2.56 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1970s | 0.0872 % change on previous year | -1.44 % change on previous year | 1.46 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1980s | 0.363 % change on previous year | -6.93 % change on previous year | 7.06 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1990s | 4.65 % change on previous year | -2.11 % change on previous year | 38.63 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 2000s | 0.4153 % change on previous year | -1.2 % change on previous year | 3.1 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 2010s | 0.0915 % change on previous year | -2.25 % change on previous year | 2.98 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 2020s | -2.17 % change on previous year | -6.32 % change on previous year | 1.41 % change on previous year | 6 |
Countries ranked near Kazakhstan
- 167 Yemen -5.85 % change on previous year compare
- 168 Portugal -5.92 % change on previous year compare
- 169 Mauritania -6.24 % change on previous year compare
- 171 South Sudan -7.03 % change on previous year compare
- 172 Thailand -8.02 % change on previous year compare
- 173 Uganda -10.04 % change on previous year compare
More gender data for Kazakhstan
- Child population (UN estimates and projections) 6,050 (2030)
- Child population (UN estimates and projections) (0-14), annual growth -0.2514 % change on previous year (2030)
- Population 15,953 (2030)
- Working-age population (UN estimates and projections) 15,953 (2030)
- Population (UN estimates and projections), annual growth rate 1.54 % change on previous year (2030)
- Age population, age 00, female, interpolated 192,023 (2025)
- Age population, age 00, male, interpolated 204,014 (2025)
- Age population, age 01, female, interpolated 195,086 (2025)
- Age population, age 01, male, interpolated 207,220 (2025)
- Age population, age 02, female, interpolated 198,672 (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is key features of womens political empowerment, annual growth rate in Kazakhstan?
- Key features of womens political empowerment, annual growth rate in Kazakhstan was -6.32 % change on previous year in 2025, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest key features of womens political empowerment, annual growth rate recorded in Kazakhstan?
- The highest recorded value was 38.63 % change on previous year in 1990.
- What is the lowest key features of womens political empowerment, annual growth rate recorded in Kazakhstan?
- The lowest recorded value was -15.22 % change on previous year in 1929.
- How does Kazakhstan rank for key features of womens political empowerment, annual growth rate?
- Kazakhstan ranks 170th out of 176 countries with data for 2025.
- Where does this Kazakhstan data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Key features of womens political empowerment, annual growth rate. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 223 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
The year-on-year percentage change in Key features of womens political empowerment. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.
Computed from
- Key features of women's political empowerment V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Key features of womens political empowerment. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.