Statizoid

Is There No Legal Provision That Requires a Married Woman to Obey Her in Chile

Chile: Is There No Legal Provision That Requires a Married Woman to Obey Her was 1 in 2023. ◆ Volatile

Latest (2023)
1
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
1st
of 188 countries
All-time high
1
in 1990
All-time low
0
in 1970
Years of data
54
1970–2023

Is There No Legal Provision That Requires a Married Woman to Obey Her in Chile, 1970–2023

00.20.40.60.81197019962023

Source: International Monetary Fund.

Analysis

In 2023, is there no legal provision that requires a married woman to obey her in Chile stood at 1. That is the highest value across all 54 years on record.

Compared with earlier readings it is unchanged over ten years.

Over the whole period, is there no legal provision that requires a married woman to obey her in Chile peaked at 1 in 1990 and was at its lowest, 0, in 1970.

That places Chile 1st out of 188 countries with data for 2023, putting it in the top 10%.

The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.

Is There No Legal Provision That Requires a Married Woman to Obey Her in Chile, year by year

Year Value Change
1970 0 —
1971 0 —
1972 0 —
1973 0 —
1974 0 —
1975 0 —
1976 0 —
1977 0 —
1978 0 —
1979 0 —
1980 0 —
1981 0 —
1982 0 —
1983 0 —
1984 0 —
1985 0 —
1986 0 —
1987 0 —
1988 0 —
1989 0 —
1990 1 —
1991 1 +0.0%
1992 1 +0.0%
1993 1 +0.0%
1994 1 +0.0%
1995 1 +0.0%
1996 1 +0.0%
1997 1 +0.0%
1998 1 +0.0%
1999 1 +0.0%
2000 1 +0.0%
2001 1 +0.0%
2002 1 +0.0%
2003 1 +0.0%
2004 1 +0.0%
2005 1 +0.0%
2006 1 +0.0%
2007 1 +0.0%
2008 1 +0.0%
2009 1 +0.0%
2010 1 +0.0%
2011 1 +0.0%
2012 1 +0.0%
2013 1 +0.0%
2014 1 +0.0%
2015 1 +0.0%
2016 1 +0.0%
2017 1 +0.0%
2018 1 +0.0%
2019 1 +0.0%
2020 1 +0.0%
2021 1 +0.0%
2022 1 +0.0%
2023 1 +0.0%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
1970s 0 0 0 10
1980s 0 0 0 10
1990s 1 1 1 10
2000s 1 1 1 10
2010s 1 1 1 10
2020s 1 1 1 4

Countries ranked near Chile

  1. 1 Angola 1 compare
  2. 1 Albania 1 compare
  3. 1 United Arab Emirates 1 compare
  4. 1 Argentina 1 compare
  5. 1 Armenia 1 compare
  6. 1 Antigua and Barbuda 1 compare
  7. 1 Australia 1 compare
  8. 1 Austria 1 compare
  9. 1 Azerbaijan 1 compare
  10. 1 Burundi 1 compare
  11. 1 Belgium 1 compare
  12. 1 Benin 1 compare
  13. 1 Burkina Faso 1 compare
  14. 1 Bangladesh 1 compare
  15. 1 Bulgaria 1 compare
  16. 1 Bahamas 1 compare
  17. 1 Bosnia and Herzegovina 1 compare
  18. 1 Belarus 1 compare
  19. 1 Belize 1 compare
  20. 1 Bolivia, Plurinational State of 1 compare
  21. 1 Brazil 1 compare
  22. 1 Barbados 1 compare
  23. 1 Bhutan 1 compare
  24. 1 Botswana 1 compare
  25. 1 Central African Republic 1 compare
  26. 1 Canada 1 compare
  27. 1 Switzerland 1 compare
  28. 1 China 1 compare
  29. 1 Côte d'Ivoire 1 compare
  30. 1 Cameroon 1 compare
  31. 1 Congo, Democratic Republic of the 1 compare
  32. 1 Congo 1 compare
  33. 1 Colombia 1 compare
  34. 1 Comoros 1 compare
  35. 1 Cape Verde 1 compare
  36. 1 Costa Rica 1 compare
  37. 1 Cyprus 1 compare
  38. 1 Czechia 1 compare
  39. 1 Germany 1 compare
  40. 1 Dominica 1 compare
  41. 1 Denmark 1 compare
  42. 1 Dominican Republic 1 compare
  43. 1 Algeria 1 compare
  44. 1 Ecuador 1 compare
  45. 1 Eritrea 1 compare
  46. 1 Spain 1 compare
  47. 1 Estonia 1 compare
  48. 1 Ethiopia 1 compare
  49. 1 Finland 1 compare
  50. 1 Fiji 1 compare
  51. 1 France 1 compare
  52. 1 Micronesia, Federated States of 1 compare
  53. 1 Gabon 1 compare
  54. 1 United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland 1 compare
  55. 1 Georgia 1 compare
  56. 1 Ghana 1 compare
  57. 1 Guinea 1 compare
  58. 1 Gambia 1 compare
  59. 1 Guinea-Bissau 1 compare
  60. 1 Greece 1 compare
  61. 1 Grenada 1 compare
  62. 1 Guatemala 1 compare
  63. 1 Guyana 1 compare
  64. 1 Hong Kong, China 1 compare
  65. 1 Honduras 1 compare
  66. 1 Croatia 1 compare
  67. 1 Haiti 1 compare
  68. 1 Hungary 1 compare
  69. 1 Indonesia 1 compare
  70. 1 India 1 compare
  71. 1 Ireland 1 compare
  72. 1 Iceland 1 compare
  73. 1 Israel 1 compare
  74. 1 Italy 1 compare
  75. 1 Jamaica 1 compare
  76. 1 Japan 1 compare
  77. 1 Kazakhstan 1 compare
  78. 1 Kenya 1 compare
  79. 1 Kyrgyzstan 1 compare
  80. 1 Cambodia 1 compare
  81. 1 Kiribati 1 compare
  82. 1 Saint Kitts and Nevis 1 compare
  83. 1 Korea 1 compare
  84. 1 Kosovo 1 compare
  85. 1 Lao People's Democratic Republic 1 compare
  86. 1 Lebanon 1 compare
  87. 1 Liberia 1 compare
  88. 1 Libya 1 compare
  89. 1 Saint Lucia 1 compare
  90. 1 Sri Lanka 1 compare
  91. 1 Lesotho 1 compare
  92. 1 Lithuania 1 compare
  93. 1 Luxembourg 1 compare
  94. 1 Latvia 1 compare
  95. 1 Morocco 1 compare
  96. 1 Republic of Moldova 1 compare
  97. 1 Madagascar 1 compare
  98. 1 Maldives 1 compare
  99. 1 Mexico 1 compare
  100. 1 Marshall Islands 1 compare
  101. 1 North Macedonia 1 compare
  102. 1 Malta 1 compare
  103. 1 Myanmar 1 compare
  104. 1 Montenegro 1 compare
  105. 1 Mongolia 1 compare
  106. 1 Mozambique 1 compare
  107. 1 Mauritius 1 compare
  108. 1 Malawi 1 compare
  109. 1 Namibia 1 compare
  110. 1 Niger 1 compare
  111. 1 Nigeria 1 compare
  112. 1 Nicaragua 1 compare
  113. 1 Netherlands 1 compare
  114. 1 Norway 1 compare
  115. 1 Nepal 1 compare
  116. 1 New Zealand 1 compare
  117. 1 Oman 1 compare
  118. 1 Pakistan 1 compare
  119. 1 Panama 1 compare
  120. 1 Peru 1 compare
  121. 1 Philippines 1 compare
  122. 1 Palau 1 compare
  123. 1 Papua New Guinea 1 compare
  124. 1 Poland 1 compare
  125. 1 Puerto Rico 1 compare
  126. 1 Portugal 1 compare
  127. 1 Paraguay 1 compare
  128. 1 Romania 1 compare
  129. 1 Russian Federation 1 compare
  130. 1 Rwanda 1 compare
  131. 1 Senegal 1 compare
  132. 1 Singapore 1 compare
  133. 1 Solomon Islands 1 compare
  134. 1 Sierra Leone 1 compare
  135. 1 El Salvador 1 compare
  136. 1 San Marino 1 compare
  137. 1 Somalia 1 compare
  138. 1 Serbia 1 compare
  139. 1 South Sudan 1 compare
  140. 1 Sao Tome and Principe 1 compare
  141. 1 Suriname 1 compare
  142. 1 Slovakia 1 compare
  143. 1 Slovenia 1 compare
  144. 1 Sweden 1 compare
  145. 1 Eswatini 1 compare
  146. 1 Seychelles 1 compare
  147. 1 Syrian Arab Republic 1 compare
  148. 1 Chad 1 compare
  149. 1 Togo 1 compare
  150. 1 Thailand 1 compare
  151. 1 Tajikistan 1 compare
  152. 1 Timor-Leste 1 compare
  153. 1 Tonga 1 compare
  154. 1 Trinidad and Tobago 1 compare
  155. 1 Tunisia 1 compare
  156. 1 Türkiye 1 compare
  157. 1 Tanzania, United Republic of 1 compare
  158. 1 Uganda 1 compare
  159. 1 Ukraine 1 compare
  160. 1 Uruguay 1 compare
  161. 1 United States of America 1 compare
  162. 1 Uzbekistan 1 compare
  163. 1 Saint Vincent and the Grenadines 1 compare
  164. 1 Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of 1 compare
  165. 1 Viet Nam 1 compare
  166. 1 Vanuatu 1 compare
  167. 1 Samoa 1 compare
  168. 1 South Africa 1 compare
  169. 1 Zambia 1 compare
  170. 1 Zimbabwe 1 compare

See the full ranking of 188 places →

More gender data for Chile

All data for Chile →

Frequently asked questions

What is is there no legal provision that requires a married woman to obey her in Chile?
Is there no legal provision that requires a married woman to obey her in Chile was 1 in 2023, according to International Monetary Fund.
What is the highest is there no legal provision that requires a married woman to obey her recorded in Chile?
The highest recorded value was 1 in 1990.
What is the lowest is there no legal provision that requires a married woman to obey her recorded in Chile?
The lowest recorded value was 0 in 1970.
How does Chile rank for is there no legal provision that requires a married woman to obey her?
Chile ranks 1st out of 188 countries with data for 2023.
Is is there no legal provision that requires a married woman to obey her rising or falling in Chile?
Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
Where does this Chile data come from?
The figures come from International Monetary Fund, published as part of Is There No Legal Provision That Requires a Married Woman to Obey Her Husband?. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 54 observations, free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Is There No Legal Provision That Requires a Married Woman to Obey Her in Chile. Statizoid, drawing on International Monetary Fund. Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://gender.statizoid.com/stat/is-there-no-legal-provision-that-requires-a-married-woman-to-obey-her-husband/chile/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://gender.statizoid.com/stat/is-there-no-legal-provision-that-requires-a-married-woman-to-obey-her-husband/chile/">Is There No Legal Provision That Requires a Married Woman to Obey Her in Chile</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Is There No Legal Provision That Requires a Married Woman to Obey Her Husband?
Source
International Monetary Fund
Licence
IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
188 places, 10,152 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Data on the legal rights that affects women's economic empowerment.