AFR vs Rwanda: Women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) who have their need for
AFR
58.1%
in 2024
Rwanda
72.1%
in 2019
AFR rank
12th
Rwanda rank
11th
Women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) who have their need for over time
- AFR
- Rwanda
How they compare
Rwanda currently reports 72.1% against 58.1% in AFR, a difference of 14.0%.
That makes Rwanda's figure about 1.2 times AFR's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2000 it was AFR ahead.
AFR ranks 12th and Rwanda ranks 11th of 13 groups.
Across the 2 decades both report, AFR averaged higher in 1 and Rwanda in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | AFR | Rwanda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 41.5% | 22.9% | 18.6% | AFR |
| 2010s | 51.4% | 65.1% | 13.6% | Rwanda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) who have their need for, AFR or Rwanda?
- Rwanda, at 72.1% against 58.1% in AFR as of 2019.
- What is the difference in women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) who have their need for between AFR and Rwanda?
- 14.0%, with Rwanda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for AFR and Rwanda?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2019.
- How do AFR and Rwanda rank globally for women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) who have their need for?
- AFR ranks 12th and Rwanda ranks 11th of 13 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) who have their need for family planning satisfied with modern methods (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.