South Sudan vs Sri Lanka: Women high blood pressure
South Sudan
36
in 2019
Sri Lanka
36.5
in 2019
South Sudan rank
114th
Sri Lanka rank
111th
Women high blood pressure over time
- South Sudan
- Sri Lanka
How they compare
Sri Lanka currently reports 36.5 against 36 in South Sudan, a difference of 0.5.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 30 shared years of data; in 1990 it was South Sudan ahead.
South Sudan ranks 114th and Sri Lanka ranks 111th of 195 countries.
South Sudan has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | South Sudan | Sri Lanka | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 34.99 | 32.09 | 2.9 | South Sudan |
| 2000s | 36.83 | 32.33 | 4.5 | South Sudan |
| 2010s | 36.95 | 35 | 1.95 | South Sudan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher women high blood pressure, South Sudan or Sri Lanka?
- Sri Lanka, at 36.5 against 36 in South Sudan as of 2019.
- What is the difference in women high blood pressure between South Sudan and Sri Lanka?
- 0.5, with Sri Lanka ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for South Sudan and Sri Lanka?
- 30 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2019.
- How do South Sudan and Sri Lanka rank globally for women high blood pressure?
- South Sudan ranks 114th and Sri Lanka ranks 111th of 195 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Women high blood pressure. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.