Costa Rica vs Equatorial Guinea: Women Business and the Law Index (WBL), Parenthood Score
Costa Rica
60
in 2023
Equatorial Guinea
60
in 2023
Costa Rica rank
76th
Equatorial Guinea rank
76th
Women Business and the Law Index (WBL), Parenthood Score over time
- Costa Rica
- Equatorial Guinea
How they compare
Costa Rica currently reports 60 against 60 in Equatorial Guinea, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Costa Rica ahead.
Costa Rica ranks 76th and Equatorial Guinea ranks 76th of 188 countries.
Across the 6 decades both report, Costa Rica averaged higher in 2 and Equatorial Guinea in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Costa Rica | Equatorial Guinea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 20 | 0 | 20 | Costa Rica |
| 1980s | 28 | 12 | 16 | Costa Rica |
| 1990s | 40 | 40 | 0 | — |
| 2000s | 40 | 40 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 40 | 54 | 14 | Equatorial Guinea |
| 2020s | 50 | 60 | 10 | Equatorial Guinea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher women business and the law index (wbl), parenthood score, Costa Rica or Equatorial Guinea?
- Costa Rica, at 60 against 60 in Equatorial Guinea as of 2023.
- What is the difference in women business and the law index (wbl), parenthood score between Costa Rica and Equatorial Guinea?
- 0, with Costa Rica ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Equatorial Guinea?
- 54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
- How do Costa Rica and Equatorial Guinea rank globally for women business and the law index (wbl), parenthood score?
- Costa Rica ranks 76th and Equatorial Guinea ranks 76th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Women Business and the Law Index (WBL), Parenthood Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Data on the legal rights that affects women's economic empowerment.