Mus vs Sao Tome and Principe: Women accessing antenatal care (ANC) services who were tested for
Mus
81.1%
in 2019
Sao Tome and Principe
100.0%
in 2019
Mus rank
1st
Sao Tome and Principe rank
1st
Women accessing antenatal care (ANC) services who were tested for over time
- Mus
- Sao Tome and Principe
How they compare
Sao Tome and Principe currently reports 100.0% against 81.1% in Mus, a difference of 18.9%.
That makes Sao Tome and Principe's figure about 1.2 times Mus's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 7 shared years of data; in 2011 it was Mus ahead.
Mus ranks 1st and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 1st of 1 regions.
Mus has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher women accessing antenatal care (anc) services who were tested for, Mus or Sao Tome and Principe?
- Sao Tome and Principe, at 100.0% against 81.1% in Mus as of 2019.
- What is the difference in women accessing antenatal care (anc) services who were tested for between Mus and Sao Tome and Principe?
- 18.9%, with Sao Tome and Principe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mus and Sao Tome and Principe?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2019.
- How do Mus and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for women accessing antenatal care (anc) services who were tested for?
- Mus ranks 1st and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 1st of 1 regions.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Women accessing antenatal care (ANC) services who were tested for syphilis (%), reported. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.