IDA & IBRD total vs New Zealand: Urban population, male
IDA & IBRD total
24.6%
in 2015
New Zealand
42.1%
in 2015
IDA & IBRD total rank
27th
New Zealand rank
30th
Urban population, male over time
- IDA & IBRD total
- New Zealand
How they compare
New Zealand currently reports 42.1% against 24.6% in IDA & IBRD total, a difference of 17.5%.
That makes New Zealand's figure about 1.7 times IDA & IBRD total's.
Across all 8 years both countries report, New Zealand has been ahead every year.
IDA & IBRD total ranks 27th and New Zealand ranks 30th of 47 groups.
New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | IDA & IBRD total | New Zealand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 16.2% | 40.9% | 24.7% | New Zealand |
| 1990s | 18.6% | 41.4% | 22.8% | New Zealand |
| 2000s | 21.0% | 41.8% | 20.8% | New Zealand |
| 2010s | 23.9% | 42.0% | 18.2% | New Zealand |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher urban population, male, IDA & IBRD total or New Zealand?
- New Zealand, at 42.1% against 24.6% in IDA & IBRD total as of 2015.
- What is the difference in urban population, male between IDA & IBRD total and New Zealand?
- 17.5%, with New Zealand ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for IDA & IBRD total and New Zealand?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2015.
- How do IDA & IBRD total and New Zealand rank globally for urban population, male?
- IDA & IBRD total ranks 27th and New Zealand ranks 30th of 47 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- The United Nations Population Division's World Urbanization Prospects, published as Urban population, male (% of total). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Male urban population is the percentage of males who live in urban areas to total population.