IDA & IBRD total vs South Korea: Urban population, female (% of total)
IDA & IBRD total
24.1%
in 2015
South Korea
41.4%
in 2015
IDA & IBRD total rank
27th
South Korea rank
30th
Urban population, female (% of total) over time
- IDA & IBRD total
- South Korea
How they compare
South Korea currently reports 41.4% against 24.1% in IDA & IBRD total, a difference of 17.3%.
That makes South Korea's figure about 1.7 times IDA & IBRD total's.
Across all 8 years both countries report, South Korea has been ahead every year.
IDA & IBRD total ranks 27th and South Korea ranks 30th of 47 groups.
South Korea has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | IDA & IBRD total | South Korea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 16.0% | 30.5% | 14.5% | South Korea |
| 1990s | 18.4% | 37.9% | 19.5% | South Korea |
| 2000s | 20.7% | 40.2% | 19.4% | South Korea |
| 2010s | 23.4% | 41.2% | 17.8% | South Korea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher urban population, female, IDA & IBRD total or South Korea?
- South Korea, at 41.4% against 24.1% in IDA & IBRD total as of 2015.
- What is the difference in urban population, female between IDA & IBRD total and South Korea?
- 17.3%, with South Korea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for IDA & IBRD total and South Korea?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2015.
- How do IDA & IBRD total and South Korea rank globally for urban population, female?
- IDA & IBRD total ranks 27th and South Korea ranks 30th of 47 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- The United Nations Population Division's World Urbanization Prospects, published as Urban population, female (% of total). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Female urban population is the percentage of females who live in urban areas to total population.