Tajikistan vs Viet Nam: Women's universal right to vote
Tajikistan
1
in 2025
Viet Nam
1
in 2025
Tajikistan rank
1st
Viet Nam rank
1st
Women's universal right to vote over time
- Tajikistan
- Viet Nam
How they compare
Tajikistan currently reports 1 against 1 in Viet Nam, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 136 shared years of data; in 1868 it was Viet Nam ahead.
Tajikistan ranks 1st and Viet Nam ranks 1st of 198 countries.
Tajikistan has averaged higher in every one of the 16 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Tajikistan | Viet Nam | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1860s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1870s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1880s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1890s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1900s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1910s | 0.3 | 0 | 0.3 | Tajikistan |
| 1920s | 1 | 0 | 1 | Tajikistan |
| 1930s | 1 | 0 | 1 | Tajikistan |
| 1940s | 1 | 0 | 1 | Tajikistan |
| 1950s | 1 | 0 | 1 | Tajikistan |
| 1970s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1980s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1990s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2000s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2020s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher women's universal right to vote, Tajikistan or Viet Nam?
- Tajikistan, at 1 against 1 in Viet Nam as of 2025.
- What is the difference in women's universal right to vote between Tajikistan and Viet Nam?
- 0, with Tajikistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Tajikistan and Viet Nam?
- 136 years are reported by both, from 1868 to 2025.
- How do Tajikistan and Viet Nam rank globally for women's universal right to vote?
- Tajikistan ranks 1st and Viet Nam ranks 1st of 198 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Women's universal right to vote. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates whether all women are allowed to vote in national elections. It neither considers informal restrictions nor legal restrictions based on age, criminal conviction, disability, and local residency.