Slovakia vs Syrian Arab Republic: Women's universal right to vote
Slovakia
1
in 2025
Syrian Arab Republic
1
in 2025
Slovakia rank
1st
Syrian Arab Republic rank
1st
Women's universal right to vote over time
- Slovakia
- Syrian Arab Republic
How they compare
Slovakia currently reports 1 against 1 in Syrian Arab Republic, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 108 shared years of data; in 1918 it was Syrian Arab Republic ahead.
Slovakia ranks 1st and Syrian Arab Republic ranks 1st of 198 countries.
Slovakia has averaged higher in every one of the 12 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Slovakia | Syrian Arab Republic | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1910s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1920s | 1 | 0 | 1 | Slovakia |
| 1930s | 1 | 0 | 1 | Slovakia |
| 1940s | 1 | 0 | 1 | Slovakia |
| 1950s | 1 | 0.7 | 0.3 | Slovakia |
| 1960s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1970s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1980s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1990s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2000s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2020s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher women's universal right to vote, Slovakia or Syrian Arab Republic?
- Slovakia, at 1 against 1 in Syrian Arab Republic as of 2025.
- What is the difference in women's universal right to vote between Slovakia and Syrian Arab Republic?
- 0, with Slovakia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Slovakia and Syrian Arab Republic?
- 108 years are reported by both, from 1918 to 2025.
- How do Slovakia and Syrian Arab Republic rank globally for women's universal right to vote?
- Slovakia ranks 1st and Syrian Arab Republic ranks 1st of 198 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Women's universal right to vote. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates whether all women are allowed to vote in national elections. It neither considers informal restrictions nor legal restrictions based on age, criminal conviction, disability, and local residency.