Sierra Leone vs United States: Women's universal right to vote
Sierra Leone
1
in 2025
United States
1
in 2025
Sierra Leone rank
1st
United States rank
1st
Women's universal right to vote over time
- Sierra Leone
- United States
How they compare
Sierra Leone currently reports 1 against 1 in United States, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 130 shared years of data; in 1896 it was United States ahead.
Sierra Leone ranks 1st and United States ranks 1st of 198 countries.
Sierra Leone has averaged higher in every one of the 14 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Sierra Leone | United States | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1890s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1900s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1910s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1920s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1930s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1940s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1950s | 0.2 | 0 | 0.2 | Sierra Leone |
| 1960s | 1 | 0.5 | 0.5 | Sierra Leone |
| 1970s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1980s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1990s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2000s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2020s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher women's universal right to vote, Sierra Leone or United States?
- Sierra Leone, at 1 against 1 in United States as of 2025.
- What is the difference in women's universal right to vote between Sierra Leone and United States?
- 0, with Sierra Leone ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Sierra Leone and United States?
- 130 years are reported by both, from 1896 to 2025.
- How do Sierra Leone and United States rank globally for women's universal right to vote?
- Sierra Leone ranks 1st and United States ranks 1st of 198 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Women's universal right to vote. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates whether all women are allowed to vote in national elections. It neither considers informal restrictions nor legal restrictions based on age, criminal conviction, disability, and local residency.