Samoa vs Sao Tome and Principe: Women's universal right to vote
Samoa
1
in 2025
Sao Tome and Principe
1
in 2025
Samoa rank
1st
Sao Tome and Principe rank
1st
Women's universal right to vote over time
- Samoa
- Sao Tome and Principe
How they compare
Samoa currently reports 1 against 1 in Sao Tome and Principe, a difference of 0.
Across all 124 years both countries report, Sao Tome and Principe has been ahead every year.
Samoa ranks 1st and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 1st of 198 countries.
Sao Tome and Principe has averaged higher in every one of the 13 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Samoa | Sao Tome and Principe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1900s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1910s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1920s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1930s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1940s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1950s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1960s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1970s | 0 | 0.5 | 0.5 | Sao Tome and Principe |
| 1980s | 0 | 1 | 1 | Sao Tome and Principe |
| 1990s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2000s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2020s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher women's universal right to vote, Samoa or Sao Tome and Principe?
- Samoa, at 1 against 1 in Sao Tome and Principe as of 2025.
- What is the difference in women's universal right to vote between Samoa and Sao Tome and Principe?
- 0, with Samoa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Samoa and Sao Tome and Principe?
- 124 years are reported by both, from 1902 to 2025.
- How do Samoa and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for women's universal right to vote?
- Samoa ranks 1st and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 1st of 198 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Women's universal right to vote. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates whether all women are allowed to vote in national elections. It neither considers informal restrictions nor legal restrictions based on age, criminal conviction, disability, and local residency.