Russian Federation vs Western Sahara: Women's universal right to vote
Russian Federation
1
in 2025
Western Sahara
1
in 2025
Russian Federation rank
1st
Western Sahara rank
1st
Women's universal right to vote over time
- Russian Federation
- Western Sahara
How they compare
Russian Federation currently reports 1 against 1 in Western Sahara, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1963 it was Russian Federation ahead.
Russian Federation ranks 1st and Western Sahara ranks 1st of 198 countries.
Russian Federation has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Russian Federation | Western Sahara | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 1 | 0 | 1 | Russian Federation |
| 1970s | 1 | 0 | 1 | Russian Federation |
| 1980s | 1 | 0 | 1 | Russian Federation |
| 1990s | 1 | 0 | 1 | Russian Federation |
| 2000s | 1 | 0.2 | 0.8 | Russian Federation |
| 2010s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2020s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher women's universal right to vote, Russian Federation or Western Sahara?
- Russian Federation, at 1 against 1 in Western Sahara as of 2025.
- What is the difference in women's universal right to vote between Russian Federation and Western Sahara?
- 0, with Russian Federation ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Russian Federation and Western Sahara?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1963 to 2025.
- How do Russian Federation and Western Sahara rank globally for women's universal right to vote?
- Russian Federation ranks 1st and Western Sahara ranks 1st of 198 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Women's universal right to vote. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates whether all women are allowed to vote in national elections. It neither considers informal restrictions nor legal restrictions based on age, criminal conviction, disability, and local residency.