Portugal vs Viet Nam: Women's universal right to vote
Portugal
1
in 2025
Viet Nam
1
in 2025
Portugal rank
1st
Viet Nam rank
1st
Women's universal right to vote over time
- Portugal
- Viet Nam
How they compare
Portugal currently reports 1 against 1 in Viet Nam, a difference of 0.
Across all 215 years both countries report, Viet Nam has been ahead every year.
Portugal ranks 1st and Viet Nam ranks 1st of 198 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Portugal | Viet Nam | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1780s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1790s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1800s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1810s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1820s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1830s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1840s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1850s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1860s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1870s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1880s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1890s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1900s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1910s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1920s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1930s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1940s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1950s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1970s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1980s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1990s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2000s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2020s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher women's universal right to vote, Portugal or Viet Nam?
- Portugal, at 1 against 1 in Viet Nam as of 2025.
- What is the difference in women's universal right to vote between Portugal and Viet Nam?
- 0, with Portugal ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Portugal and Viet Nam?
- 215 years are reported by both, from 1789 to 2025.
- How do Portugal and Viet Nam rank globally for women's universal right to vote?
- Portugal ranks 1st and Viet Nam ranks 1st of 198 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Women's universal right to vote. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates whether all women are allowed to vote in national elections. It neither considers informal restrictions nor legal restrictions based on age, criminal conviction, disability, and local residency.