Portugal vs Solomon Islands: Women's universal right to vote
Portugal
1
in 2025
Solomon Islands
1
in 2025
Portugal rank
1st
Solomon Islands rank
1st
Women's universal right to vote over time
- Portugal
- Solomon Islands
How they compare
Portugal currently reports 1 against 1 in Solomon Islands, a difference of 0.
Across all 133 years both countries report, Solomon Islands has been ahead every year.
Portugal ranks 1st and Solomon Islands ranks 1st of 198 countries.
Solomon Islands has averaged higher in every one of the 14 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Portugal | Solomon Islands | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1890s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1900s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1910s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1920s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1930s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1940s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1950s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1960s | 0 | 0.6 | 0.6 | Solomon Islands |
| 1970s | 0.5 | 1 | 0.5 | Solomon Islands |
| 1980s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1990s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2000s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2020s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher women's universal right to vote, Portugal or Solomon Islands?
- Portugal, at 1 against 1 in Solomon Islands as of 2025.
- What is the difference in women's universal right to vote between Portugal and Solomon Islands?
- 0, with Portugal ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Portugal and Solomon Islands?
- 133 years are reported by both, from 1893 to 2025.
- How do Portugal and Solomon Islands rank globally for women's universal right to vote?
- Portugal ranks 1st and Solomon Islands ranks 1st of 198 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Women's universal right to vote. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates whether all women are allowed to vote in national elections. It neither considers informal restrictions nor legal restrictions based on age, criminal conviction, disability, and local residency.