Papua New Guinea vs Solomon Islands: Women's universal right to vote
Papua New Guinea
1
in 2025
Solomon Islands
1
in 2025
Papua New Guinea rank
1st
Solomon Islands rank
1st
Women's universal right to vote over time
- Papua New Guinea
- Solomon Islands
How they compare
Papua New Guinea currently reports 1 against 1 in Solomon Islands, a difference of 0.
Across all 133 years both countries report, Solomon Islands has been ahead every year.
Papua New Guinea ranks 1st and Solomon Islands ranks 1st of 198 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Papua New Guinea | Solomon Islands | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1890s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1900s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1910s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1920s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1930s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1940s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1950s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1960s | 0.6 | 0.6 | 0 | — |
| 1970s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1980s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1990s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2000s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2020s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher women's universal right to vote, Papua New Guinea or Solomon Islands?
- Papua New Guinea, at 1 against 1 in Solomon Islands as of 2025.
- What is the difference in women's universal right to vote between Papua New Guinea and Solomon Islands?
- 0, with Papua New Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Papua New Guinea and Solomon Islands?
- 133 years are reported by both, from 1893 to 2025.
- How do Papua New Guinea and Solomon Islands rank globally for women's universal right to vote?
- Papua New Guinea ranks 1st and Solomon Islands ranks 1st of 198 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Women's universal right to vote. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates whether all women are allowed to vote in national elections. It neither considers informal restrictions nor legal restrictions based on age, criminal conviction, disability, and local residency.