Papua New Guinea vs Poland: Women's universal right to vote
Papua New Guinea
1
in 2025
Poland
1
in 2025
Papua New Guinea rank
1st
Poland rank
1st
Women's universal right to vote over time
- Papua New Guinea
- Poland
How they compare
Papua New Guinea currently reports 1 against 1 in Poland, a difference of 0.
Across all 142 years both countries report, Poland has been ahead every year.
Papua New Guinea ranks 1st and Poland ranks 1st of 198 countries.
Poland has averaged higher in every one of the 15 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Papua New Guinea | Poland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1890s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1900s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1910s | 0 | 0.1 | 0.1 | Poland |
| 1920s | 0 | 1 | 1 | Poland |
| 1930s | 0 | 1 | 1 | Poland |
| 1940s | 0 | 1 | 1 | Poland |
| 1950s | 0 | 1 | 1 | Poland |
| 1960s | 0.6 | 1 | 0.4 | Poland |
| 1970s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1980s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1990s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2000s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2020s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher women's universal right to vote, Papua New Guinea or Poland?
- Papua New Guinea, at 1 against 1 in Poland as of 2025.
- What is the difference in women's universal right to vote between Papua New Guinea and Poland?
- 0, with Papua New Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Papua New Guinea and Poland?
- 142 years are reported by both, from 1884 to 2025.
- How do Papua New Guinea and Poland rank globally for women's universal right to vote?
- Papua New Guinea ranks 1st and Poland ranks 1st of 198 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Women's universal right to vote. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates whether all women are allowed to vote in national elections. It neither considers informal restrictions nor legal restrictions based on age, criminal conviction, disability, and local residency.