Nicaragua vs Singapore: Women's universal right to vote
Nicaragua
1
in 2025
Singapore
1
in 2025
Nicaragua rank
1st
Singapore rank
1st
Women's universal right to vote over time
- Nicaragua
- Singapore
How they compare
Nicaragua currently reports 1 against 1 in Singapore, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 159 shared years of data; in 1867 it was Singapore ahead.
Nicaragua ranks 1st and Singapore ranks 1st of 198 countries.
Nicaragua has averaged higher in every one of the 17 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Nicaragua | Singapore | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1860s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1870s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1880s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1890s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1900s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1910s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1920s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1930s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1940s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1950s | 0.3 | 0.1 | 0.2 | Nicaragua |
| 1960s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1970s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1980s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1990s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2000s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2020s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher women's universal right to vote, Nicaragua or Singapore?
- Nicaragua, at 1 against 1 in Singapore as of 2025.
- What is the difference in women's universal right to vote between Nicaragua and Singapore?
- 0, with Nicaragua ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Nicaragua and Singapore?
- 159 years are reported by both, from 1867 to 2025.
- How do Nicaragua and Singapore rank globally for women's universal right to vote?
- Nicaragua ranks 1st and Singapore ranks 1st of 198 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Women's universal right to vote. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates whether all women are allowed to vote in national elections. It neither considers informal restrictions nor legal restrictions based on age, criminal conviction, disability, and local residency.