Nicaragua vs Serbia: Women's universal right to vote
Nicaragua
1
in 2025
Serbia
1
in 2025
Nicaragua rank
1st
Serbia rank
1st
Women's universal right to vote over time
- Nicaragua
- Serbia
How they compare
Nicaragua currently reports 1 against 1 in Serbia, a difference of 0.
Across all 188 years both countries report, Serbia has been ahead every year.
Nicaragua ranks 1st and Serbia ranks 1st of 198 countries.
Serbia has averaged higher in every one of the 20 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Nicaragua | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1830s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1840s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1850s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1860s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1870s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1880s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1890s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1900s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1910s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1920s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1930s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1940s | 0 | 0.5 | 0.5 | Serbia |
| 1950s | 0.3 | 1 | 0.7 | Serbia |
| 1960s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1970s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1980s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1990s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2000s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2020s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher women's universal right to vote, Nicaragua or Serbia?
- Nicaragua, at 1 against 1 in Serbia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in women's universal right to vote between Nicaragua and Serbia?
- 0, with Nicaragua ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Nicaragua and Serbia?
- 188 years are reported by both, from 1838 to 2025.
- How do Nicaragua and Serbia rank globally for women's universal right to vote?
- Nicaragua ranks 1st and Serbia ranks 1st of 198 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Women's universal right to vote. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates whether all women are allowed to vote in national elections. It neither considers informal restrictions nor legal restrictions based on age, criminal conviction, disability, and local residency.