Mongolia vs Seychelles: Women's universal right to vote

Mongolia
1
in 2025
Seychelles
1
in 2025
Mongolia rank
1st
Seychelles rank
1st

Women's universal right to vote over time

  • Mongolia
  • Seychelles
00.20.40.60.81190319642025

How they compare

Mongolia currently reports 1 against 1 in Seychelles, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 115 shared years of data; in 1911 it was Seychelles ahead.

Mongolia ranks 1st and Seychelles ranks 1st of 197 countries.

Mongolia has averaged higher in every one of the 12 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mongolia Seychelles Difference Ahead
1910s 0 0 0 β€”
1920s 0.6 0 0.6 Mongolia
1930s 1 0 1 Mongolia
1940s 1 0 1 Mongolia
1950s 1 0 1 Mongolia
1960s 1 0.3 0.7 Mongolia
1970s 1 1 0 β€”
1980s 1 1 0 β€”
1990s 1 1 0 β€”
2000s 1 1 0 β€”
2010s 1 1 0 β€”
2020s 1 1 0 β€”

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher women's universal right to vote, Mongolia or Seychelles?
Mongolia, at 1 against 1 in Seychelles as of 2025.
What is the difference in women's universal right to vote between Mongolia and Seychelles?
0, with Mongolia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mongolia and Seychelles?
115 years are reported by both, from 1911 to 2025.
How do Mongolia and Seychelles rank globally for women's universal right to vote?
Mongolia ranks 1st and Seychelles ranks 1st of 197 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Women's universal right to vote. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Women's universal right to vote
Source
Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
198 places, 32,485 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed

Indicates whether all women are allowed to vote in national elections. It neither considers informal restrictions nor legal restrictions based on age, criminal conviction, disability, and local residency.