Monaco vs Peru: Women's universal right to vote
Monaco
1
in 2025
Peru
1
in 2025
Monaco rank
1st
Peru rank
1st
Women's universal right to vote over time
- Monaco
- Peru
How they compare
Monaco currently reports 1 against 1 in Peru, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 212 shared years of data; in 1814 it was Peru ahead.
Monaco ranks 1st and Peru ranks 1st of 197 countries.
Monaco has averaged higher in every one of the 22 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Monaco | Peru | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1810s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1820s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1830s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1840s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1850s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1860s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1870s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1880s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1890s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1900s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1910s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1920s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1930s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1940s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1950s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1960s | 0.8 | 0 | 0.8 | Monaco |
| 1970s | 1 | 0.1 | 0.9 | Monaco |
| 1980s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1990s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2000s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2020s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher women's universal right to vote, Monaco or Peru?
- Monaco, at 1 against 1 in Peru as of 2025.
- What is the difference in women's universal right to vote between Monaco and Peru?
- 0, with Monaco ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Monaco and Peru?
- 212 years are reported by both, from 1814 to 2025.
- How do Monaco and Peru rank globally for women's universal right to vote?
- Monaco ranks 1st and Peru ranks 1st of 197 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Women's universal right to vote. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates whether all women are allowed to vote in national elections. It neither considers informal restrictions nor legal restrictions based on age, criminal conviction, disability, and local residency.