Mauritius vs New Zealand: Women's universal right to vote
Mauritius
1
in 2025
New Zealand
1
in 2025
Mauritius rank
1st
New Zealand rank
1st
Women's universal right to vote over time
- Mauritius
- New Zealand
How they compare
Mauritius currently reports 1 against 1 in New Zealand, a difference of 0.
Across all 141 years both countries report, New Zealand has been ahead every year.
Mauritius ranks 1st and New Zealand ranks 1st of 198 countries.
New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 15 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mauritius | New Zealand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1890s | 0 | 0.7 | 0.7 | New Zealand |
| 1900s | 0 | 1 | 1 | New Zealand |
| 1910s | 0 | 1 | 1 | New Zealand |
| 1920s | 0 | 1 | 1 | New Zealand |
| 1930s | 0 | 1 | 1 | New Zealand |
| 1940s | 0 | 1 | 1 | New Zealand |
| 1950s | 0.1 | 1 | 0.9 | New Zealand |
| 1960s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1970s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1980s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1990s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2000s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2020s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher women's universal right to vote, Mauritius or New Zealand?
- Mauritius, at 1 against 1 in New Zealand as of 2025.
- What is the difference in women's universal right to vote between Mauritius and New Zealand?
- 0, with Mauritius ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and New Zealand?
- 141 years are reported by both, from 1885 to 2025.
- How do Mauritius and New Zealand rank globally for women's universal right to vote?
- Mauritius ranks 1st and New Zealand ranks 1st of 198 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Women's universal right to vote. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates whether all women are allowed to vote in national elections. It neither considers informal restrictions nor legal restrictions based on age, criminal conviction, disability, and local residency.