Luxembourg vs Tajikistan: Women's universal right to vote
Luxembourg
1
in 2025
Tajikistan
1
in 2025
Luxembourg rank
1st
Tajikistan rank
1st
Women's universal right to vote over time
- Luxembourg
- Tajikistan
How they compare
Luxembourg currently reports 1 against 1 in Tajikistan, a difference of 0.
Across all 158 years both countries report, Tajikistan has been ahead every year.
Luxembourg ranks 1st and Tajikistan ranks 1st of 198 countries.
Tajikistan has averaged higher in every one of the 17 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Luxembourg | Tajikistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1860s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1870s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1880s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1890s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1900s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1910s | 0.1 | 0.3 | 0.2 | Tajikistan |
| 1920s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1930s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1940s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1950s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1960s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1970s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1980s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1990s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2000s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2020s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher women's universal right to vote, Luxembourg or Tajikistan?
- Luxembourg, at 1 against 1 in Tajikistan as of 2025.
- What is the difference in women's universal right to vote between Luxembourg and Tajikistan?
- 0, with Luxembourg ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Luxembourg and Tajikistan?
- 158 years are reported by both, from 1868 to 2025.
- How do Luxembourg and Tajikistan rank globally for women's universal right to vote?
- Luxembourg ranks 1st and Tajikistan ranks 1st of 198 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Women's universal right to vote. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates whether all women are allowed to vote in national elections. It neither considers informal restrictions nor legal restrictions based on age, criminal conviction, disability, and local residency.