Lithuania vs Trinidad and Tobago: Women's universal right to vote
Lithuania
1
in 2025
Trinidad and Tobago
1
in 2025
Lithuania rank
1st
Trinidad and Tobago rank
1st
Women's universal right to vote over time
- Lithuania
- Trinidad and Tobago
How they compare
Lithuania currently reports 1 against 1 in Trinidad and Tobago, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 108 shared years of data; in 1918 it was Lithuania ahead.
Lithuania ranks 1st and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 1st of 198 countries.
Lithuania has averaged higher in every one of the 12 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lithuania | Trinidad and Tobago | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1910s | 1 | 0 | 1 | Lithuania |
| 1920s | 1 | 0 | 1 | Lithuania |
| 1930s | 1 | 0 | 1 | Lithuania |
| 1940s | 1 | 0.4 | 0.6 | Lithuania |
| 1950s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1960s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1970s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1980s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1990s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2000s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2020s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher women's universal right to vote, Lithuania or Trinidad and Tobago?
- Lithuania, at 1 against 1 in Trinidad and Tobago as of 2025.
- What is the difference in women's universal right to vote between Lithuania and Trinidad and Tobago?
- 0, with Lithuania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lithuania and Trinidad and Tobago?
- 108 years are reported by both, from 1918 to 2025.
- How do Lithuania and Trinidad and Tobago rank globally for women's universal right to vote?
- Lithuania ranks 1st and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 1st of 198 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Women's universal right to vote. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates whether all women are allowed to vote in national elections. It neither considers informal restrictions nor legal restrictions based on age, criminal conviction, disability, and local residency.