Libya vs Uruguay: Women's universal right to vote
Libya
1
in 2025
Uruguay
1
in 2025
Libya rank
1st
Uruguay rank
1st
Women's universal right to vote over time
- Libya
- Uruguay
How they compare
Libya currently reports 1 against 1 in Uruguay, a difference of 0.
Across all 201 years both countries report, Uruguay has been ahead every year.
Libya ranks 1st and Uruguay ranks 1st of 197 countries.
Uruguay has averaged higher in every one of the 21 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Libya | Uruguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1820s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1830s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1840s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1850s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1860s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1870s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1880s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1890s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1900s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1910s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1920s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1930s | 0 | 0.8 | 0.8 | Uruguay |
| 1940s | 0 | 1 | 1 | Uruguay |
| 1950s | 0 | 1 | 1 | Uruguay |
| 1960s | 0.6 | 1 | 0.4 | Uruguay |
| 1970s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1980s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1990s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2000s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2020s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher women's universal right to vote, Libya or Uruguay?
- Libya, at 1 against 1 in Uruguay as of 2025.
- What is the difference in women's universal right to vote between Libya and Uruguay?
- 0, with Libya ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Libya and Uruguay?
- 201 years are reported by both, from 1825 to 2025.
- How do Libya and Uruguay rank globally for women's universal right to vote?
- Libya ranks 1st and Uruguay ranks 1st of 197 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Women's universal right to vote. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates whether all women are allowed to vote in national elections. It neither considers informal restrictions nor legal restrictions based on age, criminal conviction, disability, and local residency.