Libya vs Tunisia: Women's universal right to vote

Libya
1
in 2025
Tunisia
1
in 2025
Libya rank
1st
Tunisia rank
1st

Women's universal right to vote over time

  • Libya
  • Tunisia
00.20.40.60.81178919072025

How they compare

Libya currently reports 1 against 1 in Tunisia, a difference of 0.

Across all 231 years both countries report, Tunisia has been ahead every year.

Libya ranks 1st and Tunisia ranks 1st of 197 countries.

Tunisia has averaged higher in every one of the 24 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Libya Tunisia Difference Ahead
1790s 0 0 0 β€”
1800s 0 0 0 β€”
1810s 0 0 0 β€”
1820s 0 0 0 β€”
1830s 0 0 0 β€”
1840s 0 0 0 β€”
1850s 0 0 0 β€”
1860s 0 0 0 β€”
1870s 0 0 0 β€”
1880s 0 0 0 β€”
1890s 0 0 0 β€”
1900s 0 0 0 β€”
1910s 0 0 0 β€”
1920s 0 0 0 β€”
1930s 0 0 0 β€”
1940s 0 0 0 β€”
1950s 0 0.1 0.1 Tunisia
1960s 0.6 1 0.4 Tunisia
1970s 1 1 0 β€”
1980s 1 1 0 β€”
1990s 1 1 0 β€”
2000s 1 1 0 β€”
2010s 1 1 0 β€”
2020s 1 1 0 β€”

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher women's universal right to vote, Libya or Tunisia?
Libya, at 1 against 1 in Tunisia as of 2025.
What is the difference in women's universal right to vote between Libya and Tunisia?
0, with Libya ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Libya and Tunisia?
231 years are reported by both, from 1795 to 2025.
How do Libya and Tunisia rank globally for women's universal right to vote?
Libya ranks 1st and Tunisia ranks 1st of 197 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Women's universal right to vote. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Women's universal right to vote
Source
Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
198 places, 32,485 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed

Indicates whether all women are allowed to vote in national elections. It neither considers informal restrictions nor legal restrictions based on age, criminal conviction, disability, and local residency.