Libya vs Romania: Women's universal right to vote

Libya
1
in 2025
Romania
1
in 2025
Libya rank
1st
Romania rank
1st

Women's universal right to vote over time

  • Libya
  • Romania
00.20.40.60.81178919072025

How they compare

Libya currently reports 1 against 1 in Romania, a difference of 0.

Across all 231 years both countries report, Romania has been ahead every year.

Libya ranks 1st and Romania ranks 1st of 197 countries.

Romania has averaged higher in every one of the 24 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Libya Romania Difference Ahead
1790s 0 0 0 β€”
1800s 0 0 0 β€”
1810s 0 0 0 β€”
1820s 0 0 0 β€”
1830s 0 0 0 β€”
1840s 0 0 0 β€”
1850s 0 0 0 β€”
1860s 0 0 0 β€”
1870s 0 0 0 β€”
1880s 0 0 0 β€”
1890s 0 0 0 β€”
1900s 0 0 0 β€”
1910s 0 0 0 β€”
1920s 0 0 0 β€”
1930s 0 0 0 β€”
1940s 0 0.4 0.4 Romania
1950s 0 1 1 Romania
1960s 0.6 1 0.4 Romania
1970s 1 1 0 β€”
1980s 1 1 0 β€”
1990s 1 1 0 β€”
2000s 1 1 0 β€”
2010s 1 1 0 β€”
2020s 1 1 0 β€”

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher women's universal right to vote, Libya or Romania?
Libya, at 1 against 1 in Romania as of 2025.
What is the difference in women's universal right to vote between Libya and Romania?
0, with Libya ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Libya and Romania?
231 years are reported by both, from 1795 to 2025.
How do Libya and Romania rank globally for women's universal right to vote?
Libya ranks 1st and Romania ranks 1st of 197 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Women's universal right to vote. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Women's universal right to vote
Source
Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
198 places, 32,485 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed

Indicates whether all women are allowed to vote in national elections. It neither considers informal restrictions nor legal restrictions based on age, criminal conviction, disability, and local residency.