Kyrgyzstan vs Naoero: Women's universal right to vote
Kyrgyzstan
1
in 2025
Naoero
1
in 2025
Kyrgyzstan rank
1st
Naoero rank
1st
Women's universal right to vote over time
- Kyrgyzstan
- Naoero
How they compare
Kyrgyzstan currently reports 1 against 1 in Naoero, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 138 shared years of data; in 1888 it was Naoero ahead.
Kyrgyzstan ranks 1st and Naoero ranks 1st of 198 countries.
Kyrgyzstan has averaged higher in every one of the 15 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kyrgyzstan | Naoero | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1890s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1900s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1910s | 0.3 | 0 | 0.3 | Kyrgyzstan |
| 1920s | 1 | 0 | 1 | Kyrgyzstan |
| 1930s | 1 | 0 | 1 | Kyrgyzstan |
| 1940s | 1 | 0 | 1 | Kyrgyzstan |
| 1950s | 1 | 0.9 | 0.1 | Kyrgyzstan |
| 1960s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1970s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1980s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1990s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2000s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2020s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher women's universal right to vote, Kyrgyzstan or Naoero?
- Kyrgyzstan, at 1 against 1 in Naoero as of 2025.
- What is the difference in women's universal right to vote between Kyrgyzstan and Naoero?
- 0, with Kyrgyzstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kyrgyzstan and Naoero?
- 138 years are reported by both, from 1888 to 2025.
- How do Kyrgyzstan and Naoero rank globally for women's universal right to vote?
- Kyrgyzstan ranks 1st and Naoero ranks 1st of 198 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Women's universal right to vote. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates whether all women are allowed to vote in national elections. It neither considers informal restrictions nor legal restrictions based on age, criminal conviction, disability, and local residency.