Kuwait vs Nepal: Women's universal right to vote

Kuwait
1
in 2025
Nepal
1
in 2025
Kuwait rank
1st
Nepal rank
1st

Women's universal right to vote over time

  • Kuwait
  • Nepal
00.20.40.60.81178919072025

How they compare

Kuwait currently reports 1 against 1 in Nepal, a difference of 0.

Across all 237 years both countries report, Nepal has been ahead every year.

Kuwait ranks 1st and Nepal ranks 1st of 197 countries.

Nepal has averaged higher in every one of the 25 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Kuwait Nepal Difference Ahead
1780s 0 0 0 β€”
1790s 0 0 0 β€”
1800s 0 0 0 β€”
1810s 0 0 0 β€”
1820s 0 0 0 β€”
1830s 0 0 0 β€”
1840s 0 0 0 β€”
1850s 0 0 0 β€”
1860s 0 0 0 β€”
1870s 0 0 0 β€”
1880s 0 0 0 β€”
1890s 0 0 0 β€”
1900s 0 0 0 β€”
1910s 0 0 0 β€”
1920s 0 0 0 β€”
1930s 0 0 0 β€”
1940s 0 0 0 β€”
1950s 0 0.2 0.2 Nepal
1960s 0 1 1 Nepal
1970s 0 1 1 Nepal
1980s 0 1 1 Nepal
1990s 0 1 1 Nepal
2000s 0.4 1 0.6 Nepal
2010s 1 1 0 β€”
2020s 1 1 0 β€”

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher women's universal right to vote, Kuwait or Nepal?
Kuwait, at 1 against 1 in Nepal as of 2025.
What is the difference in women's universal right to vote between Kuwait and Nepal?
0, with Kuwait ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Kuwait and Nepal?
237 years are reported by both, from 1789 to 2025.
How do Kuwait and Nepal rank globally for women's universal right to vote?
Kuwait ranks 1st and Nepal ranks 1st of 197 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Women's universal right to vote. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Women's universal right to vote
Source
Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
198 places, 32,485 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed

Indicates whether all women are allowed to vote in national elections. It neither considers informal restrictions nor legal restrictions based on age, criminal conviction, disability, and local residency.