Georgia vs Libya: Women's universal right to vote

Georgia
1
in 2025
Libya
1
in 2025
Georgia rank
1st
Libya rank
1st

Women's universal right to vote over time

  • Georgia
  • Libya
00.20.40.60.81179519102025

How they compare

Georgia currently reports 1 against 1 in Libya, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 226 shared years of data; in 1800 it was Libya ahead.

Georgia ranks 1st and Libya ranks 1st of 197 countries.

Georgia has averaged higher in every one of the 23 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Georgia Libya Difference Ahead
1800s 0 0 0 β€”
1810s 0 0 0 β€”
1820s 0 0 0 β€”
1830s 0 0 0 β€”
1840s 0 0 0 β€”
1850s 0 0 0 β€”
1860s 0 0 0 β€”
1870s 0 0 0 β€”
1880s 0 0 0 β€”
1890s 0 0 0 β€”
1900s 0 0 0 β€”
1910s 0.3 0 0.3 Georgia
1920s 1 0 1 Georgia
1930s 1 0 1 Georgia
1940s 1 0 1 Georgia
1950s 1 0 1 Georgia
1960s 1 0.6 0.4 Georgia
1970s 1 1 0 β€”
1980s 1 1 0 β€”
1990s 1 1 0 β€”
2000s 1 1 0 β€”
2010s 1 1 0 β€”
2020s 1 1 0 β€”

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher women's universal right to vote, Georgia or Libya?
Georgia, at 1 against 1 in Libya as of 2025.
What is the difference in women's universal right to vote between Georgia and Libya?
0, with Georgia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and Libya?
226 years are reported by both, from 1800 to 2025.
How do Georgia and Libya rank globally for women's universal right to vote?
Georgia ranks 1st and Libya ranks 1st of 197 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Women's universal right to vote. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Women's universal right to vote
Source
Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
198 places, 32,485 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed

Indicates whether all women are allowed to vote in national elections. It neither considers informal restrictions nor legal restrictions based on age, criminal conviction, disability, and local residency.